Opportunities and challenges for improving the quality of reporting clinical research: CONSORT and beyond
- 17 August 2004
- journal article
- Published by CMA Impact Inc. in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
- Vol. 171 (4), 349-350
- https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1040031
Abstract
Improvements in the quality of reporting of RCTs must be based on strong evidence. A series of studies beginning in 1995 found empirical evidence that results may be biased when trials use inferior methods or are reported without adequate description of the methods; notably, failure to conceal the allocation process is associated with an exaggeration of the effectiveness of an intervention of 30% or more.1,2 The cause for concern is obvious: if the conduct or reporting of RCTs is poor, treatments may be introduced that are less effective than was thought or that might even be ineffective. This concern led the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) group to formulate a series of recommendations in 19963 and 2001.4,5 This commentary summarizes developments within CONSORT since 2001.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trialsBMJ, 2004
- Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD InitiativeAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2003
- Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized TrialsJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2001
- Value of Flow Diagrams in Reports of Randomized Controlled TrialsJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2001
- Completeness of Safety Reporting in Randomized TrialsJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2001
- Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in EpidemiologyA Proposal for ReportingJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2000
- Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled TrialsJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 1996
- Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statementJAMA, 1996
- Empirical Evidence of BiasJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 1995
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 1995