The relationship between unimanual capacity and bimanual performance in children with congenital hemiplegia
- 16 August 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology
- Vol. 52 (9), 811-816
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03588.x
Abstract
AIM This study explores the relationship between unimanual capacity and bimanual performance for children with congenital hemiplegia aged 5 to 16 years. It also examines the relationship between impairments and unimanual capacity and bimanual performance. METHOD Participants in this cross-sectional study attended a screening assessment before participating in a large, randomized trial. They comprised 70 children with congenital hemiplegia (39 males, 31 females; mean age 10y 6mo, SD 3y); 18 were classified in the Manual Ability Classification System level I, 51 in level II, and one in level III. Eighteen were in Gross Motor Function Classification System, level I and 52 in level II. Sixty-five participants had spasticity and five had dystonia and spasticity. Fifteen typically developing children (7 males, 8 females; mean age 8y 8mo, SD 2y 7mo), matched to study participants for age and sex, were recruited as a comparison group for measures of sensation, grip strength, and movement efficiency. Outcome measures for unimanual capacity were the Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function (MUUL), and the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT). The Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA) evaluated bimanual performance. Upper limb impairments were measured using assessments of stereognosis, moving two-point discrimination, spasticity, and grip strength. RESULTS There was a strong relationship between unimanual capacity (MUUL) and bimanual performance (AHA; r=0.83). Linear regression indicated MUUL and stereognosis accounted for 75% of the variance in AHA logit scores. Sensory measures were moderately correlated with unimanual capacity and bimanual performance. Age, sex, and grip strength did not significantly influence bimanual performance. There was no difference between children with right- and left-sided hemiplegia for motor performance. INTERPRETATION Findings of our study confirm a strong relationship between unimanual capacity and bimanual performance in a cohort of children with congenital hemiplegia. However, the directionality of the relationship is unknown and therapists cannot assume improvements in unimanual capacity will lead to gains in bimanual performance.This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tactile sensory abilities in cerebral palsy: deficits in roughness and object discriminationDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 2008
- Hand Function in Cerebral Palsy. Report of 367 Children in a Population-Based Longitudinal Health Care ProgramThe Journal of Hand Surgery, 2008
- Impaired motor imagery in right hemiparetic cerebral palsyNeuropsychologia, 2007
- Efficacy of a child-friendly form of constraint-induced movement therapy in hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a randomized control trialDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 2007
- The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) for children with cerebral palsy: scale development and evidence of validity and reliabilityDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 2007
- Motor planning in congenital hemiplegiaDisability and Rehabilitation, 2007
- Reliability of the Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb FunctionDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 2001
- Fingertip forces during object manipulation in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. I: Anticipatory scalingDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1999
- ESTABLISHING NORMAL VALUES OF MOVING TWO‐POINT DISCRIMINATION IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTSDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1996
- Aimed movements to visual targets in hemiplegic and normal children: Is the “good” hand of children with infantile hemiplegia also normal?Neuropsychologia, 1989