The relationship between cell phone use, physical and sedentary activity, and cardiorespiratory fitness in a sample of U.S. college students
Open Access
- 1 January 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
- Vol. 10 (1), 79-9
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-10-79
Abstract
Today’s cell phones increase opportunities for activities traditionally defined as sedentary behaviors (e.g., surfing the internet, playing video games). People who participate in large amounts of sedentary behaviors, relative to those who do not, tend to be less physically active, less physically fit, and at greater risk for health problems. However, cell phone use does not have to be a sedentary behavior as these devices are portable. It can occur while standing or during mild-to-moderate intensity physical activity. Thus, the relationship between cell phone use, physical and sedentary activity, and physical fitness is unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate these relationships among a sample of healthy college students. Participants were first interviewed about their physical activity behavior and cell phone use. Then body composition was assessed and the validated self-efficacy survey for exercise behaviors completed. This was followed by a progressive exercise test on a treadmill to exhaustion. Peak oxygen consumption (VO2 peak) during exercise was used to measure cardiorespiratory fitness. Hierarchical regression was used to assess the relationship between cell phone use and cardiorespiratory fitness after controlling for sex, self-efficacy, and percent body fat. Interview data was transcribed, coded, and Chi-square analysis was used to compare the responses of low and high frequency cell phone users. Cell phone use was significantly (p = 0.047) and negatively (β = −0.25) related to cardio respiratory fitness independent of sex, self-efficacy, and percent fat which were also significant predictors (p < 0.05). Interview data offered several possible explanations for this relationship. First, high frequency users were more likely than low frequency users to report forgoing opportunities for physical activity in order to use their cell phones for sedentary behaviors. Second, low frequency users were more likely to report being connected to active peer groups through their cell phones and to cite this as a motivation for physical activity. Third, high levels of cell phone use indicated a broader pattern of sedentary behaviors apart from cell phone use, such as watching television. Cell phone use, like traditional sedentary behaviors, may disrupt physical activity and reduce cardiorespiratory fitness.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do interventions to promote walking in groups increase physical activity? A meta-analysisInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2013
- Iterative development of MobileMums: a physical activity intervention for women with young childrenInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2012
- Increasing Physical Activity With Mobile Devices: A Meta-AnalysisJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2012
- Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youthInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2011
- Too Much SittingExercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 2010
- The association between problematic cellular phone use and risky behaviors and low self-esteem among Taiwanese adolescentsBMC Public Health, 2010
- Validity and reliability of measures of television viewing time and other non‐occupational sedentary behaviour of adults: a reviewObesity Reviews, 2008
- A Review of TV Viewing and Its Association With Health Outcomes in AdultsAmerican Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, 2008
- Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Fat Mass in a Large Cohort of ChildrenPLoS Medicine, 2007
- Sedentary Behavior, Physical Activity, and the Metabolic Syndrome among U.S. AdultsObesity Research, 2005