Surface Roughness of Packable Composite Resins Polished with Various Systems
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
- Vol. 16 (1), 42-47
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00450.x
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness of four packable composite resins, SureFil (Dentsply, Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil), Prodigy Condensable (Kerr Co., Orange, CA, USA), Filtek P60 (3M do Brasil, São Paulo, Brazil), and ALERT (Jeneric/Pentron, Inc., Wallingford, CT, USA) and one microhybrid composite resin (Filtek Z250, 3M do Brasil) after polishing with four finishing systems. Twenty specimens were made of each material (5 mm in diameter and 4 mm high) and were analyzed with a profilometer (Perthometer S8P, Perthen, Mahr, Germany) to measure the mean surface roughness (Ra). The specimens were then divided into four groups according to the polishing system: group 1--Sof-Lex (3M do Brasil), group 2--Enhance (Dentsply), group 3--Composite Finishing Kit (KG Sorensen, Barueri, São Paulo, Brazil), and group 4--Jiffy Polisher Cups (Ultradent Products, Inc., South Jordan, UT, USA). The specimens were polished and then evaluated for Ra, and the data were subjected to analysis of variance, analysis of covariance, and Tukey's test (p = .05). The mean Ra of SureFil polished with Sof-Lex was significantly lower than that of KG points. Prodigy Condensable polished with Enhance showed a significantly less rough surface than when polished with Sof-Lex. Filtek P60 did not exhibit a significant difference with the various polishing systems. For ALERT the lowest mean Ra was obtained with Sof-Lex and the highest mean Ra with KG points. Regarding Filtek Z250, polishing with KG and Jiffy points resulted in a significantly lower mean Ra than when polished with Enhance. Packable composite resins display variable roughness depending on the polishing system used; the Sof-Lex disks and Jiffy points resulted in the best Ra values for the majority of the materials tested. The Sof-Lex disks and the Jiffy points produced the smoothest surfaces for the tested resin composites. As a result, they should be considered for clinical use as preferred polishing systems for these resin composites.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative evaluation of polishing systems on the surface of three aesthetic materialsJournal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2008
- Effects of finishing/polishing time on surface characteristics of tooth‐coloured restorativesJournal of Oral Rehabilitation, 1998
- Comparative evaluation of polishing systems on the surface of three aesthetic materialsJournal of Oral Rehabilitation, 1997
- The effect of three polishing systems on the surface roughness of four hybrid composites: A profilometric and scanning electron microscopy studyThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1996
- The effect of time of trimming on the surface finish of anterior composite resinsJournal of Oral Rehabilitation, 1993
- An evaluation of polishing agents for composite resinsThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1991
- An evaluation of different composite resin systems finished with various abrasivesThe Journal of the American Dental Association, 1989
- Surface characteristics of posterior composites after polishing and toothbrushingActa Odontologica Scandinavica, 1987
- Effects of various finishing methods on staining and accumulation of Streptococcus mutans HS-6 on composite resinsDental Materials, 1985
- Effect of finishing on color and gloss of composites with different fillersThe Journal of the American Dental Association, 1985