Computer‐aided measurement of liver volumes in CT by means of geodesic active contour segmentation coupled with level‐set algorithms
- 26 April 2010
- journal article
- radiation imaging-physics
- Published by Wiley in Medical Physics
- Vol. 37 (5), 2159-2166
- https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3395579
Abstract
Purpose: Computerized liver extraction from hepatic CT images is challenging because the liver often abuts other organs of a similar density. The purpose of this study was to develop a computer‐aided measurement of liver volumes in hepatic CT. Methods: The authors developed a computerized liver extraction scheme based on geodesic active contour segmentation coupled with level‐set contour evolution. First, an anisotropic diffusion filter was applied to portal‐venous‐phase CT images for noise reduction while preserving the liver structure, followed by a scale‐specific gradient magnitude filter to enhance the liver boundaries. Then, a nonlinear grayscale converter enhanced the contrast of the liver parenchyma. By using the liver‐parenchyma‐enhanced image as a speed function, a fast‐marching level‐set algorithm generated an initial contour that roughly estimated the liver shape. A geodesic active contour segmentation algorithm coupled with level‐set contour evolution refined the initial contour to define the liver boundaries more precisely. The liver volume was then calculated using these refined boundaries. Hepatic CT scans of 15 prospective liver donors were obtained under a liver transplant protocol with a multidetector CT system. The liver volumes extracted by the computerized scheme were compared to those traced manually by a radiologist, used as “gold standard.” Results: The mean liver volume obtained with our scheme was 1504 cc, whereas the mean gold standard manual volume was 1457 cc, resulting in a mean absolute difference of 105 cc (7.2%). The computer‐estimated liver volumetrics agreed excellently with the gold‐standard manual volumetrics (intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.95) with no statistically significant difference . The average accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and percent volume error were 98.4%, 91.1%, 99.1%, and 7.2%, respectively. Computerized CT liver volumetry would require substantially less completion time (compared to an average of 39 min per case by manual segmentation). Conclusions: The computerized liver extraction scheme provides an efficient and accurate way of measuring liver volumes in CT.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institutes of Health (S10 RR021039)
- National Institutes of Health (P30 CA14599)
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Automated Segmentation of the Liver from 3D CT Images Using Probabilistic Atlas and Multilevel Statistical Shape ModelAcademic Radiology, 2008
- Fast connected-component labelingPattern Recognition, 2008
- Patient oriented and robust automatic liver segmentation for pre-evaluation of liver transplantationComputers in Biology and Medicine, 2008
- An electrostatic deformable model for medical image segmentationComputerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 2007
- Preoperative Volume Prediction in Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation: How Much Can We Rely on It? Essen Experience Based on Virtual Three-dimensional Computed Tomography-Volume AssessmentAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2007
- Safety of Multidetector Computed Tomography in Calculating Liver Volume for Living-Donor Liver TransplantationTransplantation Proceedings, 2006
- Update On the Potential Role of CAD in Radiologic Interpretations: Are We Making Progress?1Academic Radiology, 2005
- Current status and future potential of computer-aided diagnosis in medical imagingThe British Journal of Radiology, 2005
- Linear-time connected-component labeling based on sequential local operationsComputer Vision and Image Understanding, 2003
- Fast Marching MethodsSiam Review, 1999