Poststructuralists hold Hegel responsible for giving rise to many of modern philosophy’s problematic concepts-the authority of reason, self-consciousness, the knowing subject. Yet, according to this book, this animosity is rooted in a fundamental misunderstanding of Hegel’s thought, and resolving this tension can not only heal the rift between poststructuralism and German idealism but also point these traditions in exciting new directions. Revisiting the philosopher’s key texts, the book calls attention to Hegel’s reformulation of liberal and Cartesian conceptions of subjectivity, identifying ... More Poststructuralists hold Hegel responsible for giving rise to many of modern philosophy’s problematic concepts-the authority of reason, self-consciousness, the knowing subject. Yet, according to this book, this animosity is rooted in a fundamental misunderstanding of Hegel’s thought, and resolving this tension can not only heal the rift between poststructuralism and German idealism but also point these traditions in exciting new directions. Revisiting the philosopher’s key texts, the book calls attention to Hegel’s reformulation of liberal and Cartesian conceptions of subjectivity, identifying a critical though unrecognized continuity between poststructuralism and German idealism. Poststructuralism forged its identity in opposition to idealist subjectivity; however, the book argues this model is not found in Hegel’s texts but in an uncritical acceptance of Heidegger’s characterization of Hegel and Fichte as “metaphysicians of subjectivity.” Recasting Hegel as both post-Kantian and postmetaphysical, it sheds new light on this complex philosopher while revealing the surprising affinities between two supposedly antithetical modes of thought.