Reimbursement of Dialysis
Open Access
- 1 August 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- Vol. 23 (8), 1291-1298
- https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2011111094
Abstract
Reimbursement for chronic dialysis consumes a substantial portion of healthcare costs for a relatively small proportion of the total population. Each country has a unique reimbursement system that attempts to control rising costs. Thus, comparing the reimbursement systems between countries might be helpful to find solutions to minimize costs to society without jeopardizing quality of treatment and outcomes. We conducted a survey of seven countries to compare crude reimbursement for various dialysis modalities and evaluated additional factors, such as inclusion of drugs or physician payments in the reimbursement package, adjustment in rates for specific patient subgroups, and pay for performance therapeutic thresholds. The comparison examines the United States, the province of Ontario in Canada, and five European countries (Belgium, France, Germany, The Netherlands, and the United Kingdom). Important differences between countries exist, resulting in as much as a 3.3-fold difference between highest and lowest reimbursement rates for chronic hemodialysis. Differences persist even when our data were adjusted for per capita gross domestic product. Reimbursement for peritoneal dialysis is lower in most countries except Germany and the United States. The United Kingdom is the only country that has implemented an incentive if patients use an arteriovenous fistula. Although home hemodialysis (prolonged or daily dialysis) allows greater flexibility and better patient outcomes, reimbursement is only incentivized in The Netherlands. Unfortunately, it is not yet clear that such differences save money or improve quality of care. Future research should focus on directly testing both outcomes.This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effect of outpatient dialysis global budget cap on healthcare utilization by end-stage renal disease patientsSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 2011
- The 2011 ESRD Prospective Payment System: An Uncontrolled ExperimentAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2011
- The 2011 ESRD Prospective Payment System and the Survival of an Endangered Species: The Perspective of a Not-for-Profit Medium-Sized Dialysis OrganizationAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2011
- The 2011 ESRD Prospective Payment System: Perspectives From DaVita, a For-Profit Large Dialysis OrganizationAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2011
- In-Center Hemodialysis Six Times per Week versus Three Times per WeekThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Possible Effects of the New Medicare Reimbursement Policy on African Americans with ESRDJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2009
- Effect of Membrane Permeability on Survival of Hemodialysis PatientsJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2009
- Identifying Best Practices in Dialysis CareClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2008
- Reimbursement and economic factors influencing dialysis modality choice around the worldNephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2008
- Effect of Frequent Nocturnal Hemodialysis vs Conventional Hemodialysis on Left Ventricular Mass and Quality of LifeJAMA, 2007