The clinical utility of bone marker measurements in osteoporosis
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 January 2013
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Journal of Translational Medicine
- Vol. 11 (1), 201
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-11-201
Abstract
Osteoporosis is characterised by low bone mass and structural deterioration of bone tissue, resulting in increased fragility and susceptibility to fracture. Osteoporotic fractures are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Direct medical costs from such fractures in the UK are currently estimated at over two billion pounds per year, resulting in a substantial healthcare burden that is expected to rise exponentially due to increasing life expectancy. Currently bone mineral density is the WHO standard for diagnosis of osteoporosis, but poor sensitivity means that potential fractures will be missed if it is used alone. During the past decade considerable progress has been made in the identification and characterisation of specific biomarkers to aid the management of metabolic bone disease. Technological developments have greatly enhanced assay performance producing reliable, rapid, non-invasive cost effective assays with improved sensitivity and specificity. We now have a greater understanding of the need to regulate pre-analytical sample collection to minimise the effects of biological variation. However, bone turnover markers (BTMs) still have limited clinical utility. It is not routinely recommended to use BTMs to select those at risk of fractures, but baseline measurements of resorption markers are useful before commencement of anti-resorptive treatment and can be checked 3-6 months later to monitor response and adherence to treatment. Similarly, formation markers can be used to monitor bone forming agents. BTMs may also be useful when monitoring patients during treatment holidays and aid in the decision as to when therapy should be recommenced. Recent recommendations by the Bone Marker Standards Working Group propose to standardise research and include a specific marker of bone resorption (CTX) and bone formation (P1NP) in all future studies. It is hoped that improved research in turn will lead to optimised markers for the clinical management of osteoporosis and other bone diseases.This publication has 85 references indexed in Scilit:
- Serum Sclerostin and Risk of Hip Fracture in Older Caucasian WomenJournal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2012
- Determination of Serum and Plasma Sclerostin Concentrations by Enzyme-Linked ImmunoassaysJournal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2011
- Effects of Parathyroid Hormone Treatment on Circulating Sclerostin Levels in Postmenopausal WomenJournal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2010
- Serum Sclerostin Levels Negatively Correlate with Parathyroid Hormone Levels and Free Estrogen Index in Postmenopausal WomenJournal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2010
- Effects of Teriparatide, Alendronate, or Both in Women with Postmenopausal OsteoporosisJournal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2010
- Laboratory reproducibility of biochemical markers of bone turnover in clinical practiceOsteoporosis International, 2009
- Osteoimmunology in rheumatic diseasesArthritis Research & Therapy, 2009
- Evidence-based guidelines for the use of biochemical markers of bone turnover in the selection and monitoring of bisphosphonate treatment in osteoporosis: a consensus document of the Belgian Bone ClubInternational Journal of Clinical Practice, 2008
- Osteocytes as mechanosensors in the inhibition of bone resorption due to mechanical loadingBone, 2008
- Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor κB Ligand and Osteoprotegerin Regulation of Bone Remodeling in Health and DiseaseEndocrine Reviews, 2007