The contribution of intonation, segmental durations, and spectral features to the perception of a spontaneous and a read speaking style
- 1 July 1997
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Speech Communication
- Vol. 22 (1), 43-65
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-6393(97)00012-5
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- The contribution of prosodic boundary markers to the perceptual difference between read and spontaneous speechSpeech Communication, 1994
- Acoustic vowel reduction as a function of sentence accent, word stress, and word classSpeech Communication, 1993
- The role of focus words in natural and in synthetic continuous speech: Acoustic aspectsSpeech Communication, 1992
- On the perceptual differentiation of spontaneous and prepared speechThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1991
- Pitch-synchronous waveform processing techniques for text-to-speech synthesis using diphonesSpeech Communication, 1990
- A comparison of intrasubject variation across sessions of three vocal frequency perturbation indicesThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1989
- Perceptual differentiation of spontaneous and read utterances after resynthesis with monotone fundamental frequencyThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1987
- On spontaneous speech and fluently spoken text: Production differences and perceptual distinctionsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1986
- Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters.Psychological Bulletin, 1971
- A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960