Health care priority setting in Norway a multicriteria decision analysis
Open Access
- 15 February 2012
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 12 (1), 1-7
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-39
Abstract
Priority setting in population health is increasingly based on explicitly formulated values. The Patients Rights Act of the Norwegian tax-based health service guaranties all citizens health care in case of a severe illness, a proven health benefit, and proportionality between need and treatment. This study compares the values of the country's health policy makers with these three official principles. In total 34 policy makers participated in a discrete choice experiment, weighting the relative value of six policy criteria. We used multi-variate logistic regression with selection as dependent valuable to derive odds ratios for each criterion. Next, we constructed a composite league table - based on the sum score for the probability of selection - to rank potential interventions in five major disease areas. The group considered cost effectiveness, large individual benefits and severity of disease as the most important criteria in decision making. Priority interventions are those related to cardiovascular diseases and respiratory diseases. Less attractive interventions rank those related to mental health. Norwegian policy makers' values are in agreement with principles formulated in national health laws. Multi-criteria decision approaches may provide a tool to support explicit allocation decisions.This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reducing Disparities in Breast Cancer Survival - The Effect of Large-Scale Screening of the UninsuredThe Breast Journal, 2011
- Supporting tough decisions in Norway: A healthcare system approachInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2010
- Incorporating Equity–Efficiency Interactions in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis—Three Approaches Applied to Breast Cancer ControlValue in Health, 2010
- Dear policy maker: Have you made up your mind? A discrete choice experiment among policy makers and other health professionalsInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2010
- Fairness and accountability for reasonableness. Do the views of priority setting decision makers differ across health systems and levels of decision making?Social Science & Medicine (1982), 2009
- Exploring the social value of health‐care interventions: a stated preference discrete choice experimentHealth Economics, 2008
- Is the value of a life or life-year saved context specific? Further evidence from a discrete choice experimentCost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 2008
- Priority setting using multiple criteria: should a lung health programme be implemented in Nepal?Health Policy and Planning, 2007
- Using economics to set pragmatic and ethical prioritiesBMJ, 2006
- Towards a multi‐criteria approach for priority setting: an application to GhanaHealth Economics, 2006