Bank Performance, Efficiency and Ownership in Transitition Countries
- 4 June 2004
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier BV in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
Using data from 1996 to 2000, we investigate the effects of ownership, especially by a strategic foreign owner, on bank efficiency for eleven transition countries in an unbalanced panel consisting of 225 banks and 856 observations. Applying stochastic frontier estimation procedures, we compute profit and cost efficiency scores taking account of both time and country effects directly. In second-stage regressions, we take these efficiency measures along with return on assets as dependent variables with dummy variables for ownership type, a variable controlling for bank size, and dummy variables for year and country effects as explanatory variables. Methodologically, our results demonstrate the importance of including fixed effects, especially country effects, and also suggest a preference for efficiency measures over financial measures of bank performance in empirical work on transition countries. With respect to the impact of ownership, we conclude that privatization by itself is not sufficient to increase bank efficiency as government-owned banks are not appreciably less efficient than domestic private banks. Our results do support the hypothesis that foreign ownership leads to more efficient banks in transition countries. We find that foreign-owned banks are more cost-efficient than other banks and that they also provide better service, in particular if they have a strategic foreign owner. Moreover, the participation of international institutional investors is shown to have a considerable additional positive impact on profit efficiency, which is consistent with the notion that these investors facilitate the transfer of technology and know how to newly privatized banks. In addition, we find that the remaining government-owned banks are less efficient in providing services, which is consistent with the hypothesis that the better banks were privatized first in transition countries. Finally, efficiency declines with bank size, which could call into question government-orchestrated bank consolidation strategies. We conjecture that the presence of many small and efficient foreign greenfield operations in these transition countries may be responsible for this result.Other Versions
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing the success of reform in transition banking 10 years later: an interest margins analysisJournal of Policy Modeling, 2003
- Bank Performance in Transition EconomiesSSRN Electronic Journal, 2002
- How does foreign entry affect domestic banking markets?Journal of Banking & Finance, 2001
- Toward Market-Oriented Banking in the Economies in TransitionPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1999
- Opening up for foreign banks: How Central and Eastern Europe can benefit1Economics of Transition, 1997
- Bank Privatization in Poland: The Case of Bank Śla̧skiJournal of Comparative Economics, 1997
- Inside the black box: What explains differences in the efficiencies of financial institutions?Journal of Banking & Finance, 1997
- Do consumers pay for one-stop banking? Evidence from an alternative revenue functionJournal of Banking & Finance, 1996
- Polish Bank Consolidation and Foreign Competition: Creating a Market-Oriented Banking SectorJournal of Comparative Economics, 1996
- Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function modelsJournal of Econometrics, 1977