A New Method and Metric to Evaluate the Peer Review Process of Scholarly Journals
Open Access
- 6 December 2013
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Publishing Research Quarterly
- Vol. 30 (1), 23-38
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-013-9339-y
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Downside of Open-Access PublishingThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2013
- Longitudinal Trends in the Performance of Scientific Peer ReviewersAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2011
- An index to quantify an individual's scientific research outputProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005
- Assessing Publication for TenureJournal of Social Work Education, 2003
- Tenure and Promotion: Should You Publish in Electronic Journals?The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 2000
- Reprint: The Future of Electronic JournalsThe Journal of Electronic Publishing, 1998
- What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?JAMA, 1998