The characteristics of sexual abuse in sport: A multidimensional scaling analysis of events described in media reports
- 1 January 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
- Vol. 6 (4), 385-406
- https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197x.2008.9671881
Abstract
Most research on sexual abuse has been conducted within family settings (Fergusson & Mullen, 1999). In recent years, following several high profile convictions and scandals, research into sexual abuse has also encompassed institutional and community settings, such as sport and the church (Gallagher, 2000; Woolfe, Jaffe, Jette, & Poisson, 2003). Research into sexual abuse in sport, for example, began with both prevalence studies (Kirby & Greaves, 1996; Leahy, Pretty, & Tenenbaum, 2002) and qualitative analyses of the processes and experiences of athlete sexual abuse (Brackenridge, 1997; Cense & Brackenridge, 2001, Toftegaard‐Nielsen, 2001). From such work, descriptions of the modus operandi of abusers in sport, and the experiences and consequences for athlete victims, have been provided, informing both abuse prevention work and coach education. To date, however, no study has provided empirical support for multiple associations or identified patterns of sex offending in sport in ways that might allow comparisons with research‐generated models of offending outside sport. This paper reports on an analysis of 159 cases of criminally defined sexual abuse, reported in the print media over a period of 15 years. The main aim of the study was to identify the nature of sex offending in sport, focusing on the methods and locations of offenses. The data were analysed using multidimensional scaling (MDS) as a data reduction method in order to identify the underlying themes within the abuse and explore the inter‐relationships of behavior, victim, and context variables. The findings indicate that there are specific themes that can be identified within the perpetrator strategies that include “intimate,” “aggressive,” and “dominant” modes of interaction. The same patterns that are described here within the specific context of sport are consistent with themes that emerge from similar behavioral analyses of rapist (Bishopp, 2003; Canter & Heritage, 1990) and child molester groups (Canter, Hughes, & Kirby, 1998). These patterns show a correspondence to a broader behavioral model—the interpersonal circumplex (e.g., Leary, 1957). Implications for accreditation and continuing professional education of sport psychologists are notedKeywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Managing cases of abuse in sportChild Abuse Review, 2005
- The impact of child abuse in community institutions and organizations: Advancing professional and scientific understanding.Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2003
- Paedophilia: Pathology, criminality, or both? The development of a multivariate model of offence behaviour in child sexual abuseJournal of Forensic Psychiatry, 1998
- Fair Play or Fair Game? Child Sexual Abuse in Sport OrganisationsInternational Review for the Sociology of Sport, 1994
- The role of attachments, intimacy, and loneliness in the etiology and maintenance of sexual offendingSexual and Marital Therapy, 1993
- A multivariate model of sexual offence behaviour: Developments in ‘offender profiling'. I.Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 1990
- Explanations of pedophilia: A four factor modelThe Journal of Sex Research, 1986
- Who Rules Sport? Gender Divisions in the Power Structure of British Sports Organisations from 1960International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 1985
- Motivational Intent in the Sexual Assault of ChildrenCorrectional Psychologist, 1977
- Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters.Psychological Bulletin, 1971