Predictive value of alarm features in a rapid access upper gastrointestinal cancer service
Open Access
- 1 January 2005
- Vol. 54 (1), 40-45
- https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2004.039438
Abstract
Aims: (i) To determine the value of individual alarm features for predicting cancer in subjects referred to a rapid access upper gastrointestinal cancer service; and (ii) to develop a clinical prediction model for cancer and to prospectively validate this model in a further patient cohort. Methods: Patient demographics, referral indications, and subsequent diagnosis were recorded prospectively. Logistic regression analyses were employed to determine the predictive value of individual alarm features in an evaluation cohort of 1852 consecutive cases. The potential impact of applying a modified set of referral criteria was then examined in a validation cohort of 1785 patients. Results: Evaluation cohort: mean age was 59 years; cancer prevalence 3.8%; and serious benign pathology 12.8%. Dysphagia (odds ratio (OR) 3.1), weight loss (OR 2.6), and age >55 years (OR 9.5) were found to be significant predictive factors for cancer but the value of other accepted alarm features was more limited. In particular, uncomplicated dyspepsia in those over 55 years was a negative predictive factor for cancer within this high risk cohort (OR 0.1). Validation cohort: the clinical prediction model would have selected 92% of cancer patients for fast track investigation while reducing the “two week rule” workload by 572 cases (31%). Conclusions: Fast track endoscopy in subjects fulfilling current criteria for suspected upper gastrointestinal malignancy results in a significant yield of cancer (∼4%) and serious benign diseases such as peptic ulceration, strictures, and severe oesophagitis (13%). However, the predictive value of individual features for cancer varies widely. Uncomplicated dyspepsia in older subjects was a poor predictor of cancer. Application of narrower referral criteria for accessing fast track services may reduce pressures while retaining high sensitivity for cancer.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of Clinical Symptoms and Referral Volume on Endoscopy for Detecting Peptic Ulcer and Gastric NeoplasmsScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 2003
- Epidemiology and economic burden of viral hepatitis: an observational population based studyGut, 2002
- Age and alarm symptoms do not predict endoscopic findings among patients with dyspepsia: a multicentre database studyGut, 2001
- Outcome of lamivudine resistant hepatitis B virus infection in liver transplant recipients in SingaporeGut, 2001
- Gastric cancer in patients with benign dyspepsiaGut, 2001
- Dyspepsia workload in urban general practice and implications of the British Society of Gastroenterology Dyspepsia Guidelines (1996)Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2000
- Gastric cancer and other endoscopic diagnoses in patients with benign dyspepsiaGut, 2000
- Management of uninvestigated and functional dyspepsia: a working party report for the World Congresses of Gastroenterology 1998Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1999
- Dyspepsia in general practice in Denmark: A 1-year analysis of consulters in general practiceScandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 1999
- Prescribing patterns for dyspepsia in primary care: a prospective study of selected general practitionersAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1996