Risk of prematurity, low birthweight and pre-eclampsia in relation to working hours and physical activities: a systematic review
- 20 December 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Occupational and Environmental Medicine
- Vol. 64 (4), 228-243
- https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2006.026872
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Occupational activities are suspected of having an adverse impact on outcomes of pregnancy. AIM: To assess the evidence relating three major adverse outcomes (preterm delivery, low birthweight (LBW) and pre-eclampsia/gestational hypertension) to five common occupational exposures (prolonged working hours, shift work, lifting, standing and heavy physical workload). METHODS: A systematic search of Medline and Embase (1966-December 2005) using combinations of keywords and medical subject heading terms was conducted. For each relevant paper, standard details were abstracted that were then used to summarise the design features of studies, to rate their methodological quality (completeness of reporting and potential for important bias or confounding) and to provide estimates of effect. For studies with similar definitions of exposure and outcome, pooled estimates of relative risk (RR) in meta-analysis were calculated. RESULTS: 53 reports were identified-35 on preterm delivery, 34 on birth weight and 9 on pre-eclampsia or gestational hypertension. These included 21 cohort investigations. For pre-term delivery, extensive evidence relating to each of the exposures of interest was found. Findings were generally consistent and tended to rule out a more than moderate effect size (RR >1.4). The larger and most complete studies were less positive, and pooled estimates of risk pointed to only modest or null effects. For small-for-gestational age, the position was similar, but the evidence base was more limited. For pre-eclampsia and gestational hypertension, it was too small to allow firm conclusions. CONCLUSIONS: The balance of evidence is not sufficiently compelling to justify mandatory restrictions on any of the activities considered in this review. However, given some uncertainties in the evidence base and the apparent absence of important beneficial effects, it may be prudent to advise against long working hours, prolonged standing and heavy physical work, particularly late in pregnancy. Our review identifies several priorities for future investigationKeywords
This publication has 72 references indexed in Scilit:
- Shift work, duration of pregnancy, and birth weight:: The National Birth Cohort in DenmarkAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
- Social inequalities in low birth weight in England and Wales: trends and implications for future population healthJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2003
- Maternal predictors of small‐for‐gestational age in uncomplicated birthsInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2002
- Do Standing, Lifting, Climbing, or Long Hours of Work during Pregnancy Have an Effect on Fetal Growth?Epidemiology, 1997
- The association between occupational factors and preterm birth: A United States nurses' studyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- Association of rotating shiftwork with preterm births and low birth weight among never smoking women textile workers in China.Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1994
- Study of occupational risk factors for pregnancy-induced hypertension among active duty enlisted navy personnelAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1994
- The fetal and infant origins of adult disease.BMJ, 1990
- Pregnant women's working conditions and their changes during pregnancy: a national study in France.Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1987
- EFFECTS OF MATERNAL UNDERNUTRITION AND HEAVY PHYSICAL WORK DURING PREGNANCY ON BIRTH WEIGHTBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1980