Changing the Tune of Academic Writing: Muting Cognitive Entrenchment
- 9 May 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Management Inquiry
- Vol. 20 (3), 332-336
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492611408267
Abstract
Much academic writing sounds the same—stilted, distant, and overly qualified. The “sound” of academic writing is primarily the result of institutional pressures that lead authors to become cognitively entrenched in their writing style. The author of this article suggests that we not only can but should mute cognitive entrenchment and change the tune of academic writing. The author also suggests three routes for doing so—writing for nonacademic audiences, writing creatively, and reading widely—and addresses possible objections to his appeal.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Graphic Truth: Some Hidden Realities of the Review ProcessJournal of Management Inquiry, 2010
- RECONSIDERING THE TRADE-OFF BETWEEN EXPERTISE AND FLEXIBILITY: A COGNITIVE ENTRENCHMENT PERSPECTIVE.Academy of Management Review, 2010
- 22 Things I HateJournal of Management Inquiry, 2008
- On Weick: An AppreciationOrganization Studies, 2006
- Poetry and the Rhetoric of ManagementJournal of Management Inquiry, 2006
- Karl Weick: Concepts, Style and ReflectionSociological Review, 2005
- Metaphor and Analogical Reasoning in Organization Theory: beyond OrthodoxyAcademy of Management Review, 2002
- ''Catchy, clever titles are not acceptable'': Style, APA, and qualitative reportingInternational Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 1999
- Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn'tBMJ, 1996
- Telling Organizational Tales: On the Role of Narrative Fiction in the Study of OrganizationsOrganization Studies, 1995