Biased assessment of gestational age at birth when obstetric gestation is known.
Open Access
- 1 January 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Archives of Disease in Childhood
- Vol. 68 (1 Spec No), 32-34
- https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.68.1_spec_no.32
Abstract
The gestational age of 302 neonates whose obstetric gestational age was known was assessed at birth using the Dubowitz method; it was obtained from Dubowitz score both graphically from a nomogram and by calculation from the corresponding equation. The values obtained graphically differed to a lesser extent from the obstetric gestational age than did the gestation derived algebraically. With infants small for gestational age (SGA) the difference between the methods was smaller and not significant. It is concluded that the concurrent knowledge of obstetric gestational age introduced a bias in the graphic step; this did not happen in SGA infants probably because in these cases the available information is sometimes less certain. These data demonstrate that even simple procedures are influenced by concurrent information; as a philosophical point about the interpretation of data in general, this study provides an empirical example of the 'theory-ladenness of facts' in medicine.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Precision of gestational age assessment in the neonateActa Paediatrica, 1992
- Clinical Estimation of the Duration of Pregnancy in Legal Abortion—Are Doctors Biased by their Knowledge of the Duration of Amenorrhoea?Methods of Information in Medicine, 1984
- Problems of EmpiricismPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1981
- FACTS, OPINIONS AND AFFAIRES DU COEUR1American Journal of Epidemiology, 1976
- Clinical assessment of gestational age in the newborn infantThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1970