Fundamental relationships between arterial baroreflex sensitivity and dynamic cerebral autoregulation in humans
Open Access
- 1 May 2010
- journal article
- Published by American Physiological Society in Journal of Applied Physiology
- Vol. 108 (5), 1162-1168
- https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01390.2009
Abstract
The functional relationship between dynamic cerebral autoregulation (CA) and arterial baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) in humans is unknown. Given that adequate cerebral perfusion during normal physiological challenges requires the integrated control of CA and the arterial baroreflex, we hypothesized that between-individual variability in dynamic CA would be related to BRS in humans. We measured R-R interval, blood pressure, and cerebral blood flow velocity (transcranial Doppler) in 19 volunteers. BRS was estimated with the modified Oxford method (nitroprusside-phenylephrine injections) and spontaneous low-frequency (0.04–0.15) α-index. Dynamic CA was quantified using the rate of regulation (RoR) and autoregulatory index (ARI) derived from the thigh-cuff release technique and transfer function analysis of spontaneous oscillations in blood pressure and mean cerebral blood flow velocity. Results show that RoR and ARI were inversely related to nitroprusside BRS [ R = −0.72, confidence interval (CI) −0.89 to −0.40, P = 0.0005 vs. RoR; R = −0.69, CI −0.88 to −0.35, P = 0.001 vs. ARI], phenylephrine BRS ( R = −0.66, CI −0.86 to −0.29, P = 0.0002 vs. RoR; R = −0.71, CI −0.89 to −0.38, P = 0.0001 vs. ARI), and α-index ( R = −0.70, CI −0.89 to −0.40, P = 0.0008 vs. RoR; R = −0.62, CI −0.84 to −0.24, P = 0.005 vs. ARI). Transfer function gain was positively related to nitroprusside BRS ( R = 0.62, CI 0.24–0.84, P = 0.0042), phenylephrine BRS ( R = 0.52, CI 0.10–0.79, P = 0.021), and α-index ( R = 0.69, CI 0.35–0.88, P = 0.001). These findings indicate that individuals with an attenuated dynamic CA have greater BRS (and vice versa), suggesting the presence of possible compensatory interactions between blood pressure and mechanisms of cerebral blood flow control in humans. Such compensatory adjustments may account for the divergent changes in dynamic CA and BRS seen, for example, in chronic hypotension and spontaneous hypertension.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Influence of ageing on carotid baroreflex peak response latency in humansJournal Of Physiology-London, 2009
- Modulations of autonomic cardiovascular control following acute alpha-adrenergic treatment in chronic hypotensionHypertension Research, 2009
- Altered free radical metabolism in acute mountain sickness: implications for dynamic cerebral autoregulation and blood–brain barrier functionJournal Of Physiology-London, 2009
- Differential effects of acute hypoxia and high altitude on cerebral blood flow velocity and dynamic cerebral autoregulation: alterations with hyperoxiaJournal of Applied Physiology, 2008
- Asymmetric Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulatory Response to Cyclic StimuliStroke, 2007
- Probing the arterial baroreflex: is there a ‘spontaneous’ baroreflex?Clinical Autonomic Research, 2006
- Dynamic But Not Static Cerebral Autoregulation Is Impaired in Acute Ischaemic StrokeCerebrovascular Diseases, 2000
- Phase Relationship Between Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity and Blood PressureStroke, 1995
- Cerebral autoregulation dynamics in humans.Stroke, 1989
- On the reflex regulation of the cerebral blood flow and the cerebral vaso‐motor toneJournal Of Physiology-London, 1935