Practice Parameter: Evaluation of the child with microcephaly (an evidence-based review) [RETIRED]
- 15 September 2009
- journal article
- practice guideline
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Neurology
- Vol. 73 (11), 887-897
- https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181b783f7
Abstract
To make evidence-based recommendations concerning the evaluation of the child with microcephaly. Relevant literature was reviewed, abstracted, and classified. RECOMMENDATIONS were based on a 4-tiered scheme of evidence classification. Microcephaly is an important neurologic sign but there is nonuniformity in its definition and evaluation. Microcephaly may result from any insult that disturbs early brain growth and can be seen in association with hundreds of genetic syndromes. Annually, approximately 25,000 infants in the United States will be diagnosed with microcephaly (head circumference <-2 SD). Few data are available to inform evidence-based recommendations regarding diagnostic testing. The yield of neuroimaging ranges from 43% to 80%. Genetic etiologies have been reported in 15.5% to 53.3%. The prevalence of metabolic disorders is unknown but is estimated to be 1%. Children with severe microcephaly (head circumference <-3 SD) are more likely ( approximately 80%) to have imaging abnormalities and more severe developmental impairments than those with milder microcephaly (-2 to -3 SD; approximately 40%). Coexistent conditions include epilepsy ( approximately 40%), cerebral palsy ( approximately 20%), mental retardation ( approximately 50%), and ophthalmologic disorders ( approximately 20% to approximately 50%). Neuroimaging may be considered useful in identifying structural causes in the evaluation of the child with microcephaly (Level C). Targeted and specific genetic testing may be considered in the evaluation of the child with microcephaly who has clinical or imaging abnormalities that suggest a specific diagnosis or who shows no evidence of an acquired or environmental etiology (Level C). Screening for coexistent conditions such as cerebral palsy, epilepsy, and sensory deficits may also be considered (Level C). Further study is needed regarding the yield of diagnostic testing in children with microcephaly.This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- A problem in diagnosis of primary versus secondary microcephalyClinical Genetics, 2008
- Prevalence and pathogenesis of congenital anomalies in cerebral palsyArchives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal & Neonatal, 2007
- Human microcephalyCurrent Opinion in Neurobiology, 2004
- Amish lethal microcephaly: A new metabolic disorder with severe congenital microcephaly and 2‐ketoglutaric aciduriaAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 2002
- Association of epilepsy with different groups of microcephalyDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 2000
- Congenital microcephaly detected by prenatal ultrasound: genetic aspects and clinical significanceUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2000
- Neurodevelopmental and Neuroimaging Correlates in Nonsyndromal Microcephalic ChildrenJournal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 2000
- Microlissencephaly: A Heterogeneous Malformation of Cortical DevelopmentNeuropediatrics, 1998
- MRI of the Head in the Evaluation of MicrocephalyNeuropediatrics, 1993
- Epidemiology of Spastic Tetraplegic Cerebral Palsy in Sweden - I. Impairments and DisabilitiesNeuropediatrics, 1989