Methods and representativeness of a European survey in children and adolescents: the KIDSCREEN study
Open Access
- 26 July 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Public Health
- Vol. 7 (1), 1-12
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-7-182
Abstract
Background: The objective of the present study was to compare three different sampling and questionnaire administration methods used in the international KIDSCREEN study in terms of participation, response rates, and external validity. Methods: Children and adolescents aged 8–18 years were surveyed in 13 European countries using either telephone sampling and mail administration, random sampling of school listings followed by classroom or mail administration, or multistage random sampling of communities and households with self-administration of the survey materials at home. Cooperation, completion, and response rates were compared across countries and survey methods. Data on non-respondents was collected in 8 countries. The population fraction (PF, respondents in each sex-age, or educational level category, divided by the population in the same category from Eurostat census data) and population fraction ratio (PFR, ratio of PF) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals were used to analyze differences by country between the KIDSCREEN samples and a reference Eurostat population. Results: Response rates by country ranged from 18.9% to 91.2%. Response rates were highest in the school-based surveys (69.0%–91.2%). Sample proportions by age and gender were similar to the reference Eurostat population in most countries, although boys and adolescents were slightly underrepresented (PFR <1). Parents in lower educational categories were less likely to participate (PFR <1 in 5 countries). Parents in higher educational categories were overrepresented when the school and household sampling strategies were used (PFR = 1.78–2.97). Conclusion: School-based sampling achieved the highest overall response rates but also produced slightly more biased samples than the other methods. The results suggest that the samples were sufficiently representative to provide reference population values for the KIDSCREEN instrument.This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- The KIDSCREEN-52 Quality of Life Measure for Children and Adolescents: Psychometric Results from a Cross-Cultural Survey in 13 European CountriesValue in Health, 2008
- Health-Related Quality of Life Measurement in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Generic and Disease-Specific InstrumentsValue in Health, 2008
- The Use of Focus Groups in the Development of the KIDSCREEN HRQL QuestionnaireQuality of Life Research, 2006
- Socioeconomic determinants of health related quality of life in childhood and adolescence: results from a European studyJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2006
- Representativeness and Response Rates from the Domestic/International Gastroenterology Surveillance Study (DIGEST)Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1999
- Methods for Validating and Norming Translations of Health Status Questionnaires: The IQOLA Project ApproachJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1998
- Cross-Validation of Item Selection and Scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in Nine Countries: Results from the IQOLA ProjectJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1998
- Wiley Series in Probability and StatisticsPublished by Wiley ,1998
- Survey response rates: national and regional differences in a European multicentre study of vertebral osteoporosis.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1995
- Theories and Methods of Telephone SurveysAnnual Review of Sociology, 1990