Socioeconomic Status, Structural and Functional Measures of Social Support, and Mortality
Open Access
- 24 April 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in American Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 175 (12), 1275-1283
- https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwr461
Abstract
The authors examined the associations of social support with socioeconomic status (SES) and with mortality, as well as how SES differences in social support might account for SES differences in mortality. Analyses were based on 9,333 participants from the British Whitehall II Study cohort, a longitudinal cohort established in 1985 among London-based civil servants who were 35–55 years of age at baseline. SES was assessed using participant's employment grades at baseline. Social support was assessed 3 times in the 24.4-year period during which participants were monitored for death. In men, marital status, and to a lesser extent network score (but not low perceived support or high negative aspects of close relationships), predicted both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Measures of social support were not associated with cancer mortality. Men in the lowest SES category had an increased risk of death compared with those in the highest category (for all-cause mortality, hazard ratio = 1.59, 95% confidence interval: 1.21, 2.08; for cardiovascular mortality, hazard ratio = 2.48, 95% confidence interval: 1.55, 3.92). Network score and marital status combined explained 27% (95% confidence interval: 14, 43) and 29% (95% confidence interval: 17, 52) of the associations between SES and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, respectively. In women, there was no consistent association between social support indicators and mortality. The present study suggests that in men, social isolation is not only an important risk factor for mortality but is also likely to contribute to differences in mortality by SES.Keywords
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- Socioeconomic Differences in Cardiometabolic Factors: Social Causation or Health-related Selection? Evidence From the Whitehall II Cohort Study, 1991–2004American Journal of Epidemiology, 2011
- Associations of social networks with cancer mortality: A meta-analysisCritical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 2010
- Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic ReviewPLoS Medicine, 2010
- Social ties and risk for cancer – a prospective cohort studyActa Oncologica, 2009
- Life sustaining irritations? Relationship quality and mortality in the context of chronic illnessSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 2008
- The Socioeconomic Gradient in the Incidence of StrokeStroke, 2007
- Socioeconomic inequalities in physical and mental functioning of Japanese civil servants: Explanations from work and family characteristicsSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 2006
- Socioeconomic Status and Stroke Incidence in the US ElderlyStroke, 2006
- Contribution of Psychosocial Factors to Socioeconomic Differences in HealthThe Milbank Quarterly, 1998
- Magnitude and causes of mortality differences between married and unmarried men.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1993