Does knowledge of fetal outcome influence the interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocography and subsequent clinical management? A multicentre European study
Open Access
- 16 February 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 123 (13), 2208-2217
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13882
Abstract
Objective To investigate whether knowledge of fetal outcome influences retrospective interpretation of cardiotocographic tracings and subsequent management recommendations. Design Prospective online study. Setting Seven university hospitals in five European countries. Population Forty‐two intrapartum tracings from women with singleton pregnancies and uneventful antepartum courses. Methods Using an online questionnaire, 123 healthcare professionals interpreted 42 tracings without any knowledge of fetal outcome and provided management recommendations according to the National Institute of Clinical Excellence guidelines (intrapartum care). Two months later, 93 of the 123 participants re‐interpreted the same re‐ordered tracings, this time with information on the newborn's umbilical artery pH. Outcome measures Comparison of the evaluation of tracing features, overall tracing classification, and management recommendations between the initial analysis and re‐interpretation. Results In newborns with umbilical artery pH ≤ 7.05, knowledge of the pH value led to significant changes in the evaluation of all basic tracing features. In this group, classification of tracings as ‘normal’ decreased 76% (8.8–2.1%, P < 0.001), whereas classification as ‘pathologic’ increased 51% (44.7–67.5%, P < 0.001). In newborns with pH 7.06–7.19, classification of tracings as ‘normal’ decreased 36% (22.4–14.4%, P < 0.001), and in those with pH ≥ 7.20, classification of tracings as ‘pathologic’ decreased 40% (23.4–14.1%, P < 0.001). In the group of newborns with umbilical artery pH ≤ 7.05, the recommendations ‘no attention needed’ decreased 75% (10.2–2.6%, P < 0.001), and the number of recommendations ‘rapid reversal of hypoxic cause or immediate delivery’ increased 70.3% (42.1–71.7%, P < 0.001). Conclusions When provided with information on adverse fetal outcome, healthcare professionals provide a more pessimistic evaluation of basic tracing features, overall classification, and clinical management recommendations. Tweetable abstract Knowledge of adverse fetal outcome leads to more pessimistic CTG evaluation and management recommendations.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Human factors affecting the interpretation of fetal heart rate tracingsCurrent Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2012
- Knowledge of adverse neonatal outcome alters clinicians’ interpretation of the intrapartum cardiotocographBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2011
- Improving Response to Web and Mixed-Mode SurveysPublic Opinion Quarterly, 2011
- Intrapartum cardiotocograph interpretation by midwives and trainee obstetricians using a modified definition of a fetal heart rate decelerationJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2010
- The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done?Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2008
- Hindsight != foresight: the effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertaintyQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2003
- Inter‐observer variation in assessment of 845 labour admission tests: comparison between midwives and obstetricians in the clinical setting and two expertsBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2003
- Effects of Electronic Fetal-Heart-Rate Monitoring, as Compared with Periodic Auscultation, on the Neurologic Development of Premature InfantsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- FIGO newsInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1987
- FETAL HEART-RATE MONITORINGThe Lancet, 1979