Factors predictive of difficulty of mandibular third molar surgery
- 9 June 2001
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in British Dental Journal
- Vol. 190 (11), 607-610
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801052
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pell-Gregory classification is unreliable as a predictor of difficulty in extracting impacted lower third molarsBritish Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2000
- A comparison of crown size dimensions of the permanent teeth in a Nigerian and a British populationEuropean Journal of Orthodontics, 1996
- A comparison of crown size dimensions of the permanent teeth in a Nigerian and a British populationEuropean Journal of Orthodontics, 1996
- Predictor evaluation of postoperative morbidity after surgical removal of mandibular third molarsActa Odontologica Scandinavica, 1994
- A comparison of morbidity following the removal of lower third molars by the lingual split and surgical bur methodsInternational Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 1993
- Removal of impacted third molars by oral/maxillofacial surgery and general dentistry residentsSpecial Care in Dentistry, 1993
- Per- and post-operative variables of mandibular third-molar surgery by four general practitioners and one oral surgeonActa Odontologica Scandinavica, 1993
- Complications of Third Molar Surgery among University StudentsJournal of American College Health, 1991
- Morbidity following day-stay dental anaesthesiaAustralian Dental Journal, 1985
- Day‐stay oral surgeryAustralian Dental Journal, 1983