Interacting with Audiences
- 4 April 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Journalism Studies
- Vol. 17 (7), 849-859
- https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2016.1165139
Abstract
Drawing on open-ended responses to a representative survey of US journalists, this article examines how journalists’ role conceptions may be associated with distinct perceptions of and practices toward audiences, whether online or offline. In particular, this research considers the potential for more reciprocal, or mutually beneficial, interactions between journalists and audiences. Using exploratory factor analysis and normalized index scores, journalists are characterized within four role conceptions. Results show that Populist Mobilizer and Entertainment roles are more associated with digital audience engagement, while Loyal Support and Public Service roles better characterize offline interactions. Findings point to a need for better explanations of how journalists’ role conceptions connect with their engaging (or not) in more purposeful, persistent and reciprocal interactions with audiences.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Professional Roles in News ContentJournalism Studies, 2014
- J-TweetersDigital Journalism, 2014
- The Press Versus the PublicJournalism Studies, 2013
- Reciprocal JournalismJournalism Practice, 2013
- MIND THE GAPJournalism Practice, 2013
- Between Rhetoric and PracticeJournalism Studies, 2013
- THE TENSION BETWEEN PROFESSIONAL CONTROL AND OPEN PARTICIPATIONInformation, Communication & Society, 2012
- Populist disseminators, detached watchdogs, critical change agents and opportunist facilitatorsInternational Communication Gazette, 2011
- The Structure of ReciprocitySocial Psychology Quarterly, 2010
- The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary StatementAmerican Sociological Review, 1960