Thurstone Scaling as a Measurement Method to Quantify Subjective Health Outcomes
- 1 April 2008
- journal article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Medical Care
- Vol. 46 (4), 357-365
- https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0b013e31815ceca9
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many objective health outcome measures are used to monitor patients or evaluate health interventions, but there are also subjective measures. For the latter, it is difficult to derive metric data, which are needed to quantify health outcomes such as functional disability, severity of side effects, and health status. OBJECTIVE: Thurstone's Law of Comparative Judgment is presented as an alternative means to derive metric values for subjective health outcomes. The appeal of Thurstone's scaling model is that it can transform subjective individual rank order data or comparative preference data to a single group composite interval scale. To demonstrate its contribution, an empirical study was conducted, focusing on the valuation of health states. RESEARCH DESIGN: Rank order data were collected for 18 health states and were then used as input for Thurstone scaling. Visual analogue scale (VAS) values were also collected for the same states. SUBJECTS: An agency for market research recruited 212 Dutch respondents aged 18-75 years. RESULTS: The derived Thurstone values showed a strong relationship with the VAS values. The positions of the 2 worst states were almost identical on the VAS and the Thurstone scale. Intermediate states were scaled somewhat differently by the 2 methods. CONCLUSIONS: For many subjective health outcomes, Thurstone scaling and its derivatives may be an attractive methodology to arrive at quantitative measuresKeywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Dutch tariff: results and arguments for an effective design for national EQ‐5D valuation studiesHealth Economics, 2006
- Structural Equation Modeling of Paired-Comparison and Ranking Data.Psychological Methods, 2005
- Modeling Valuations for EuroQol Health StatesMedical Care, 1997
- Subjective Judgments of Speech Clarity Measured by Paired Comparisons and Category RatingEar & Hearing, 1997
- Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and PracticeJournal of Marketing, 1990
- AN ITEM ANALYSIS WHICH TAKES INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES INTO ACCOUNTBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1966
- Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurementJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 1964
- Paired comparisons and the logic of measurement.Psychological Review, 1946
- On the Theory of Scales of MeasurementScience, 1946
- A law of comparative judgment.Psychological Review, 1927