Why Is There So Much Conflict in the Middle East?
- 1 February 2005
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Conflict Resolution
- Vol. 49 (1), 141-165
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002704270824
Abstract
The Middle East is one of the most conflict-prone regions—butwhy? The Collier-Hoeffler model of civil war provides the starting point for our analysis. In an application to Africa, Collier and Hoeffler found poverty to be the most significant predictor of conflict. For conflict in the Middle East, a more complex picture emerges. Consistent with Collier and Hoeffler, the authors find that economic development and economic growth, in addition to longer periods of peace, generally decrease the likelihood of conflict. They also find that ethnic dominance is significant, while social fractionalization is not. Contrary to Collier and Hoeffler, they find that regime type matters. Variables for the Middle East region, Islamic countries, and oil dependence are not significant. Conflict in the Middle East is quite well explained by a general theory of civilwar, and there is no need to invoke a pattern of “Middle Eastern exceptionalism.”Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Armed Conflict, 1989?2003Journal of Peace Research, 2004
- Greed and grievance in civil warOxford Economic Papers, 2004
- Event History ModelingPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2004
- Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil WarAmerican Political Science Review, 2003
- Conflict in Africa: The Cost of Peaceful BehaviourJournal of African Economies, 2002
- Paradise is a Bazaar? Greed, Creed, and Governance in Civil War, 1989-99Journal of Peace Research, 2002
- On the Incidence of Civil War in AfricaJournal of Conflict Resolution, 2002
- Colorful Community or Ethnic Witches' Brew?: Multiethnicity and Domestic Conflict during and after the Cold WarJournal of Conflict Resolution, 2000
- On economic causes of civil warOxford Economic Papers, 1998
- Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent VariableAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1998