Co-morbidity data in outcomes research Are clinical data derived from administrative databases a reliable alternative to chart review?
- 1 April 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 53 (4), 343-349
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00188-2
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Increasing Use of Coronary Stents Is Associated With a Reduced Requirement for Repeat Intervention in a Large Unselected Population of Patients Referred for PTCAJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1998
- Assessing Quality Using Administrative DataAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- Inaccuracy of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9-CM) in identifying the diagnosis of ischemic cerebrovascular diseaseNeurology, 1997
- Searching for an improved clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative dataJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1996
- Using administrative data to describe casemix: A comparison with the medical recordJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1994
- A comparison of administrative versus clinical data: coronary artery bypass surgery as an exampleJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1994
- Bias in the Coding of Hospital Discharge Data and Its Implications for Quality AssessmentMedical Care, 1994
- Clinical Versus Administrative Data Bases for CABG SurgeryMedical Care, 1992
- Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databasesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- THE EFFECT OF MISCLASSIFICATION IN THE PRESENCE OF COVARIATESAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1980