Why We Need Reliable, Valid, and Appropriate Learning Disability Assessments
- 1 March 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Canadian Journal of School Psychology
- Vol. 27 (1), 58-71
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573512437025
Abstract
This paper discusses issues regarding the validity and reliability of psychoeducational assessments provided to Disability Services Offices at Canadian Universities. Several vignettes illustrate some current issues and the potential consequences when university students are given less than thorough disability evaluations and ascribed diagnoses. The article details current service provider concerns that are leading to an erosion of confidence in both the diagnoses given and the category of learning disabilities (LD) in general. The author makes an impassioned plea asking psychology clinicians to ensure that, before making a final identification of Learning Disability, they communicate a diagnosis that is defensible, that the diagnosis is clearly grounded in empirically supported research findings, and that they can illustrate that all possible causes for lower test scores have been considered.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Easier Said Than DoneCanadian Journal of School Psychology, 2012
- Investigating the Quality of Learning Disability Documentation Provided by Students in Higher EducationCanadian Journal of School Psychology, 2008
- Validity of Alternative Approaches for the Identification of Learning DisabilitiesJournal of Learning Disabilities, 2005
- Revisiting Classification and IdentificationLearning Disability Quarterly, 2005
- The Sociopsychometrics of Learning DisabilitiesJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1999
- Issues in the Definition and Diagnosis of Learning DisabilitiesJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1999
- Research Into Practice in Special EducationJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1997
- Conceptual and Empirical Problems with Discrepancy Definitions of Reading DisabilityLearning Disability Quarterly, 1991
- IQ Is Irrelevant to the Definition of Learning DisabilitiesJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1989
- Has the Learning Disabilities Field Lost Its Intelligence?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1989