Authors' Response
- 14 July 2006
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Microscopy and Microanalysis
- Vol. 12 (4), 282-284
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1431927606220518
Abstract
I am pleased to respond to the letter from Simon Burgess commenting on my article, “Misidentification of Major Constituents by Automatic Qualitative Energy Dispersive X-ray Microanalysis: A Problem That Threatens the Credibility of the Analytical Community” (Newbury, 2005). First, I am grateful for the words of support for my article, even if inevitably qualified, expressed in Mr. Burgess's letter. In response to his specific comments (in boldface), I offer the following:Keywords
This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- Misidentification of Major Constituents by Automatic Qualitative Energy Dispersive X-ray Microanalysis: A Problem that Threatens the Credibility of the Analytical CommunityMicroscopy and Microanalysis, 2005
- Limitations to accuracy in extracting characteristic line intensities from x-ray spectraJournal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2002