A libertarian case for mandatory vaccination
- 11 July 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 44 (1), 37-43
- https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2016-103486
Abstract
This paper argues that mandatory, government-enforced vaccination can be justified even within a libertarian political framework. If so, this implies that the case for mandatory vaccination is very strong indeed as it can be justified even within a framework that, at first glance, loads the philosophical dice against that conclusion. I argue that people who refuse vaccinations violate the ‘clean hands principle’, a (in this case, enforceable) moral principle that prohibits people from participating in the collective imposition of unjust harm or risk of harm. In a libertarian framework, individuals may be forced to accept certain vaccines not because they have an enforceable duty to serve the common, and not because cost–benefit analysis recommends it, but because anti-vaxxers are wrongfully imposing undue harm upon others.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Defense of Compulsory VaccinationHEC Forum, 2013
- The Problem of Political AuthorityPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,2013
- Free Market FairnessPublished by Princeton University Press ,2012
- A Brief History of LibertyPublished by Wiley ,2010
- The Elements of JusticePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2006
- Public Choice IIIPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2003
- Why is There so Little Money in U.S. Politics?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2003
- Illiberal Libertarians: Why Libertarianism Is Not a Liberal ViewPhilosophy & Public Affairs, 2001
- Mill on Liberty, Speech, and the Free SocietyPhilosophy & Public Affairs, 2000
- Morals by AgreementPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1987