Rural—Urban Differences in Privatization: Limits to the Competitive State
- 1 October 2003
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy
- Vol. 21 (5), 703-718
- https://doi.org/10.1068/c008r
Abstract
Despite two decades of experience with privatization, US local government use of contracting in public service delivery remains relatively flat. Market approaches to public goods provision emphasize the competitive state, and attribute limited degree of privatization to bureaucratic resistance. Rural development theory emphasizes the uneven impact of market solutions in rural communities. Using national data on US local government service delivery from 1992 and 1997, we analyze differences in local government service-delivery patterns by metropolitan status. Discriminant analysis suggested that structural features of markets are more important than the managerial capacity of government leaders in explaining lower rates of privatization among rural governments. These structural constraints limit the applicability of competitive approaches to local government service delivery. Our results suggest that cooperation, as an alternative to privatization at the local level and as a source of redistributive aid at the state level, may provide a more equitable alternative for disadvantaged rural communities.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Globalisation as Reterritorialisation: The Re-scaling of Urban Governance in the European UnionUrban Studies, 1999
- Market-Based Reforms in GovernmentAdministration & Society, 1998
- Consumer Sovereignty and Quasi-Market FailureJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1998
- The governance of rural areas: Some emerging research issues and agendasJournal of Rural Studies, 1998
- Public Choice Theory and Local GovernmentPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,1998
- Continuities in Size of Place Preferences in the United States, 1972–19921Rural Sociology, 1997
- Factors Important in Local Governments' Privatization DecisionsUrban Affairs Review, 1995
- Cities, unions, and the privatization of sanitation servicesJournal of Labor Research, 1994
- Regional Economic Development Policies and Programs in the United StatesPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,1990
- The Decision to Contract outUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1986