Development and validation of an electronic frailty index using routine primary care electronic health record data
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 3 March 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Age and Ageing
- Vol. 45 (3), 353-360
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afw039
Abstract
Background: frailty is an especially problematic expression of population ageing. International guidelines recommend routine identification of frailty to provide evidence-based treatment, but currently available tools require additional resource. Objectives: to develop and validate an electronic frailty index (eFI) using routinely available primary care electronic health record data. Study design and setting: retrospective cohort study. Development and internal validation cohorts were established using a randomly split sample of the ResearchOne primary care database. External validation cohort established using THIN database. Participants: patients aged 65–95, registered with a ResearchOne or THIN practice on 14 October 2008. Predictors: we constructed the eFI using the cumulative deficit frailty model as our theoretical framework. The eFI score is calculated by the presence or absence of individual deficits as a proportion of the total possible. Categories of fit, mild, moderate and severe frailty were defined using population quartiles. Outcomes: outcomes were 1-, 3- and 5-year mortality, hospitalisation and nursing home admission. Statistical analysis: hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using bivariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Discrimination was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Calibration was assessed using pseudo-R2 estimates. Results: we include data from a total of 931,541 patients. The eFI incorporates 36 deficits constructed using 2,171 CTV3 codes. One-year adjusted HR for mortality was 1.92 (95% CI 1.81–2.04) for mild frailty, 3.10 (95% CI 2.91–3.31) for moderate frailty and 4.52 (95% CI 4.16–4.91) for severe frailty. Corresponding estimates for hospitalisation were 1.93 (95% CI 1.86–2.01), 3.04 (95% CI 2.90–3.19) and 4.73 (95% CI 4.43–5.06) and for nursing home admission were 1.89 (95% CI 1.63–2.15), 3.19 (95% CI 2.73–3.73) and 4.76 (95% CI 3.92–5.77), with good to moderate discrimination but low calibration estimates. Conclusions: the eFI uses routine data to identify older people with mild, moderate and severe frailty, with robust predictive validity for outcomes of mortality, hospitalisation and nursing home admission. Routine implementation of the eFI could enable delivery of evidence-based interventions to improve outcomes for this vulnerable group.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Yorkshire and Humber
- NIHR
- National Institute for Health Research
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Frailty in the clinical scenarioThe Lancet, 2015
- Best practice guidelines for the management of frailty: a British Geriatrics Society, Age UK and Royal College of General Practitioners reportAge and Ageing, 2014
- Diagnostic test accuracy of simple instruments for identifying frailty in community-dwelling older people: a systematic reviewAge and Ageing, 2014
- Frailty Consensus: A Call to ActionJournal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2013
- Frailty in elderly peopleThe Lancet, 2013
- Prevalence and 10‐Year Outcomes of Frailty in Older Adults in Relation to Deficit AccumulationJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2010
- A standard procedure for creating a frailty indexBMC Geriatrics, 2008
- Long‐Term Risks of Death and Institutionalization of Elderly People in Relation to Deficit Accumulation at Age 70Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2006
- Frailty in Older Adults: Evidence for a PhenotypeThe Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 2001
- Accumulation of Deficits as a Proxy Measure of AgingThe Scientific World Journal, 2001