Comparison of the mixture and the classification maximum likelihood in cluster analysis
Open Access
- 1 October 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation
- Vol. 47 (3-4), 127-146
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00949659308811525
Abstract
Generally, the mixture and the classification approaches via maximum likelihood had been contrasted under different underlying assumptions.In the classification approach, the mixing proportions are assumed to be equal whereas, in the mixture approach, there are supposed to be unknown.In this paper, Monte-Carlo numerical experiments comparing both approaches, mixture and classification, in both assumptions, equal and unknown mixing proprotions are reported.These numerical experiments exhibited that assumptions on the mixing proportions is a more sensitive factor than the choice of the clustering approach, especially in the small setting.Morever, the differences between the finited sample and the asymptotic behaviour of both approaches are analyzed through additional simulations.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- A classification EM algorithm for clustering and two stochastic versionsComputational Statistics & Data Analysis, 1992
- Large-sample results for optimization-based clustering methodsJournal of Classification, 1991
- Classification and Mixture Approaches to Clustering via Maximum LikelihoodJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 1989
- Optimization methods of cluster analysisBiometrika, 1982
- Clustering Criteria and Multivariate Normal MixturesBiometrics, 1981
- Asymptotic behaviour of classification maximum likelihood estimatesBiometrika, 1978
- 389: Separating Mixtures of Normal DistributionsBiometrics, 1975
- Clustering Methods Based on Likelihood Ratio CriteriaBiometrics, 1971
- On Some Invariant Criteria for Grouping DataJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1967