What is known about tobacco industry efforts to influence tobacco tax? A systematic review of empirical studies
- 12 August 2012
- journal article
- review article
- Published by BMJ in Tobacco Control
- Vol. 22 (2), e1
- https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050098
Abstract
Objective To systematically review studies of tobacco industry efforts to influence tobacco tax policies. Methods Searches were conducted between 1 October 2009 and 31 March 2010 in 14 databases/websites, in relevant bibliographies and via experts. Studies were included if they focused on industry efforts to influence tobacco tax policies, drew on empirical evidence, were in English and concerned the period 1985–2010. In total, 36 studies met these criteria. Two reviewers undertook data extraction and critical appraisal. A random selection of 15 studies (42%) was subject to second review. Evidence was assessed thematically to identify distinct tobacco industry aims, arguments and tactics. Results A total of 34 studies examined industry efforts to influence tax levels. They suggest the tobacco industry works hard to prevent significant increases and particularly dislikes taxes ‘earmarked’ for tobacco control. Key arguments to counter increases are that tobacco taxes are socially regressive, unfair and lead to increased levels of illicit trade and negative economic impacts. For earmarked taxes, the industry also frequently tries to raise concerns about revenue allocation. Assessing industry arguments against established evidence demonstrates most are unsupported. Key industry tactics include: establishing ‘front groups’, securing credible allies, direct lobbying and publicity campaigns. Only seven studies examined efforts to influence tax structures. They suggest company preferences vary and tactics centre on direct lobbying. Conclusions The tobacco industry has historically tried to keep tobacco taxes low using consistent tactics and misleading arguments. Further research is required to explore efforts to influence tax structures, excise policies beyond the USA and recent policies.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- How Can We Support the Use of Systematic Reviews in Policymaking?PLoS Medicine, 2009
- Union Women, the Tobacco Industry, and Excise Taxes: A Lesson in Unintended ConsequencesAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2009
- Building Alliances in Unlikely Places: Progressive Allies and the Tobacco Institute's Coalition Strategy on Cigarette Excise TaxesAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2009
- Mobilising public opinion for the tobacco industry: the consumer tax alliance and excise taxesTobacco Control, 2008
- Transnational Tobacco Company Influence on Tax Policy During Privatization of a State Monopoly: British American Tobacco and UzbekistanAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2007
- The Creation of Industry Front Groups: The Tobacco Industry and “Get Government Off Our Back”American Journal of Public Health, 2007
- Young people and physical activity: a systematic review matching their views to effective interventionsHealth Education Research, 2006
- Political coalitions and working women: how the tobacco industry built a relationship with the Coalition of Labor Union WomenJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2006
- Moving East: how the transnational tobacco industry gained entry to the emerging markets of the former Soviet Union--part II: an overview of priorities and tactics used to establish a manufacturing presenceTobacco Control, 2004
- Tobacco Institute lobbying at the state and local levels of government in the 1990sTobacco Control, 2002