Should we always choose a nonparametric test when comparing two apparently nonnormal distributions?
- 31 January 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 54 (1), 86-92
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00264-x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Increasing Physicians’ Awareness of the Impact of Statistics on Research Outcomes: Comparative Power of the t-test and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test in Small Samples Applied ResearchJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1999
- Combination chemotherapy with mitoguazon, ifosfamide, MTX, etoposide (MIME) and G-CSF can efficiently mobilize PBPC in patients with Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphomaBone Marrow Transplantation, 1998
- PARAMETRIC ALTERNATIVES TO THE STUDENT / TESTUNDER VIOLATION OF NORMALITY AND HOMOGENEITY OF VARIANCEPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1992
- Parametric Alternatives to the Student T Test under Violation of Normality and Homogeneity of VariancePerceptual and Motor Skills, 1992
- A comparison between the U and V tests in the Behrens-Fisher problemBiometrika, 1983
- Robustness of Some Procedures for the Two-Sample Location ProblemJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1964
- The Wilcoxon Test and Non-Null HypothesesJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 1960
- Distributions Related to Comparison of Two Means and Two Regression CoefficientsThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1950
- THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TWO MEANS WHEN THE POPULATION VARIANCES ARE UNEQUALBiometrika, 1938