Randomized clinical trial of VNUS® ClosureFAST™ radiofrequency ablation versus laser for varicose veins
Open Access
- 10 May 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 97 (6), 810-818
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7091
Abstract
Background: Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are both associated with excellent technical, clinical and patient-reported outcomes for the treatment of varicose veins. The aim of this study was to compare the techniques in a randomized clinical trial. Methods: Consecutive patients with primary great saphenous vein reflux were randomized to EVLA (980 nm) or RFA (VNUS® ClosureFAST™) at a single centre. The primary outcome measure was postprocedural pain after 3 days. Secondary outcome measures were quality of life at 6 weeks, determined by the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) and Short Form 12 (SF-12®), and clinical improvement assessed by the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS). Analyses were performed on the basis of intention to treat using multivariable linear regression. Results: Some 131 patients were randomized to EVLA (64 patients) or RFA (67). Mean(s.d.) pain scores over 3 days were 26·4(22·1) mm for RFA and 36·8(22·5) mm for EVLA (P = 0·010). Over 10 days, mean(s.d.) pain scores were 22·0(19·8) mm versus 34·3(21·1) mm for RFA and EVLA respectively (P = 0·001). The mean(s.d.) number of analgesic tablets used was lower for RFA than for EVLA over 3 days (8·8(9·5) versus 14·2(10·7); P = 0·003) and 10 days (20·4(22·6) versus 35·9(29·4) respectively; P = 0·001). Changes in AVVQ, SF-12® and VCSS scores at 6 weeks were similar in the two groups: AVVQ (P = 0·887), VCSS (P = 0·993), SF-12® physical component score (P = 0·276) and mental component score (P = 0·449). Conclusion: RFA using VNUS® ClosureFAST™ was associated with less postprocedural pain than EVLA. However, clinical and quality-of-life improvements were similar after 6 weeks for the two treatments. Registration number: ISRCTN66818013 (http://www.controlled-trials.com).Keywords
Funding Information
- Mason Medical Research Foundation
- Royal Society of Medicine Venous Forum and Imperial College London
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Endovenous treatments for varicose veins – over-taking or over-rated?Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease, 2010
- Neovascularisation and Recurrence 2 Years After Varicose Vein Treatment for Sapheno-Femoral and Great Saphenous Vein Reflux: A Comparison of Surgery and Endovenous Laser AblationEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2009
- Suitability of Varicose Veins for Endovenous TreatmentsCardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2009
- Management of Varicose Veins: A Survey of Current Practice by Members of the Vascular Society of Great Britain and IrelandThe Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2009
- Treatment of Varicose Veins: The Present and the Future – A Questionnaire SurveyThe Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2008
- Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation with surgery for the treatment of primary great saphenous varicose veinsBritish Journal of Surgery, 2008
- Randomized trial comparing endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein with high ligation and stripping in patients with varicose veins: Short-term resultsJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2007
- A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial of VNUS Closure versus Surgery for the Treatment of Recurrent Long Saphenous Varicose VeinsEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2005
- Prospective randomized study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure procedure) versus ligation and stripping in a selected patient population (EVOLVeS Study)Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2003
- Endovenous obliteration versus conventional stripping operation in the treatment of primary varicose veins: A randomized controlled trial with comparison of the costsJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2002