Episiotomy in the United States: has anything changed?
- 31 May 2009
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 200 (5), 573.e1-573.e7
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.022
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risk Factors for Anal Sphincter Tear During Vaginal DeliveryObstetrics & Gynecology, 2007
- Anal Incontinence After Vaginal Delivery: A Five-Year Prospective Cohort StudyObstetrics & Gynecology, 2004
- Incidence, severity, and determinants of perineal pain after vaginal delivery: A prospective cohort studyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
- The Effects of Mediolateral Episiotomy on Pelvic Floor Function After Vaginal DeliveryObstetrics & Gynecology, 2004
- Episiotomy Use Among Residents and Faculty Compared With Private PractitionersObstetrics & Gynecology, 2004
- Episiotomy, operative vaginal delivery, and significant perineal trauma in nulliparous womenAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1999
- Why Don't Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines?JAMA, 1999
- Is there a benefit to episiotomy at spontaneous vaginal delivery? A natural experimentAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
- Pelvic floor damage and childbirth: a neurophysiological studyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1990
- Benefits and Risks of EpisiotomyObstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 1983