Resistance to organizational change: linking research and practice
- 6 February 2010
- journal article
- Published by Emerald in Leadership & Organization Development Journal
- Vol. 31 (1), 39-56
- https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731011010371
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to study recently published research to identify findings that provide research‐based guidance to organizational change agents and managers in addressing individual resistance to organizational change initiatives.Design/methodology/approach: The paper examines published research appearing in peer‐reviewed journals since 1998 that focus on exploring individual resistance to organizational change.Findings: Recent published research provides considerable practical guidance to organizational change agents and managers in understanding and dealing with resistance to change. Recent research examines the cognitive, affective, and behavioral dimensions of individual resistance and how it is influenced by: individual predispositions towards openness and resistance to change; individuals' considerations of threats and benefits of change; communication, understanding, participation, trust in management, management styles, and the nature of relationships with the change agents.Research limitations/implications: This paper is limited to research articles involving resistance to organizational change published in peer‐reviewed journals from 1998 to 2009. Also, the paper finds that reported research used primarily self‐report questionnaires to gather data, which are quantitatively analyzed. Such a lack of diversity of research methodologies provides a limited perspective of resistance to organizational change that might have been broadened by qualitative and practice‐based methods (e.g. case studies and action research).Practical implications: A framework is presented linking organizational change research findings to specific change practitioner recommendations. Limitations of recent research are also discussed.Originality/value: Most studies provide an examination of a limited number of variables influencing resistance to change, and are not necessary designed to provide practical guidance to change practitioners. This paper provides a comprehensive framework of constructs and variables specifically aimed at linking research‐based findings to guidance for change practitioners.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- A multidimensional view of resistance to organizational change: Exploring cognitive, emotional, and intentional responses to planned change across perceived change leadership strategiesHuman Resource Development Quarterly, 2007
- Managerial Frames and Institutional Discourses of Change: Employee Appropriation and ResistanceOrganization Studies, 2006
- Personality, context, and resistance to organizational changeEuropean Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2006
- Employee Perspectives on Implementation Communication as Predictors of Perceptions of Success and ResistanceWestern Journal of Communication, 2006
- The Structure and Function of Attitudes Toward Organizational ChangeHuman Resource Development Review, 2005
- Resistance to change: Developing an individual differences measure.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003
- Resistance to organisational change: the role of defence mechanismsJournal of Managerial Psychology, 2001
- Rethinking Resistance and Recognizing Ambivalence: A Multidimensional View of Attitudes Toward an Organizational ChangeAcademy of Management Review, 2000
- Managerial coping with organizational change: A dispositional perspective.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1999
- Organizing Frameworks in Emerging Organizations: A Cognitive Approach to the Analysis of ChangeHuman Relations, 1993