Public preferences for interventions to prevent emerging infectious disease threats: a discrete choice experiment
Open Access
- 13 February 2018
- Vol. 8 (2), e017355
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017355
Abstract
Objective When faced with an emergent epidemic with high mortality and morbidity potential, policy makers must decide what public health interventions to deploy at different stages of the outbreak. However, almost nothing is known about how the public view these interventions or how they trade off risks (of disease) with inconvenience (of interventions). In this paper, we aim to understand public perceptions on pandemic interventions, as well as to identify if there are any distinct respondent preference classes. Design A discrete choice experiment. Setting This study was fielded in Singapore between November 2012 and February 2013. Participants A random sample of 500 Singapore residents aged 21 and over, including 271 women and 229 men, was analysed. Outcome measures Demographic information was collected from each participant. Participants were also shown a series of pairs of alternatives, each combining interventions and morbidity, mortality and cost outcomes and declared a preference for one combination. A random utility model was developed to determine the individual’s preference for interventions and a hierarchical cluster analysis was performed to identify distinct respondent preference classes. Results On average, participants preferred more intense interventions, and preferred scenarios with fewer deaths and lower tax. The number of infections did not significantly influence respondents’ responses. We identified two broad classes of respondents: those who were mortality averse and those who were expenditure averse. Education was found to be a predictor of group membership. Conclusion Overall, there was considerable support for government interventions to prevent or mitigate outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases, including those that greatly restricted individual liberties, as long as the restrictions showed a reasonable chance of reducing the adverse health effects of the outbreak.Funding Information
- Ministry of Health, Singapore
- Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research
- National Medical Research Council
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- School closures and influenza: systematic review of epidemiological studiesBMJ Open, 2013
- State of Knowledge and Data Gaps of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in HumansPLoS Currents, 2013
- Estimated global mortality associated with the first 12 months of 2009 pandemic influenza A H1N1 virus circulation: a modelling studyThe Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2012
- Recommendations for and compliance with social restrictions during implementation of school closures in the early phase of the influenza A (H1N1) 2009 outbreak in Melbourne, AustraliaBMC Infectious Diseases, 2011
- Comparability of Different Methods for Estimating Influenza Infection Rates Over a Single Epidemic WaveAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2011
- Characterizing the Epidemiology of the 2009 Influenza A/H1N1 Pandemic in MexicoPLoS Medicine, 2011
- Strategies for antiviral stockpiling for future influenza pandemics: a global epidemic-economic perspectiveJournal of The Royal Society Interface, 2011
- Public views of the uk media and government reaction to the 2009 swine flu pandemicBMC Public Health, 2010
- Reflections on Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 and the International ResponsePLoS Medicine, 2010
- Global trends in emerging infectious diseasesNature, 2008