Do Hip Replacements Improve Outcomes for Hip Fracture Patients?
- 1 March 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Medical Care
- Vol. 37 (3), 285-294
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199903000-00008
Abstract
Hip fracture is a common problem among older Americans. Two types of procedures are available for repairing hip fractures: hip replacement and open or closed reduction with or without internal fixation. The assumption has been that hip replacement produces better functional outcomes. Although that is the common wisdom, outcome studies evaluating hip replacement for treatment of hip fracture are few and have not clearly documented its superiority. To compare outcomes of hip fracture patients who receive hip replacement versus another stabilizing procedure (open or closed reduction with or without internal fixation). Prospective cohort study. We studied 332 patients (age, > 65) who were hospitalized for a femoral neck fracture and discharged alive. We examined 2 treatment groups, hip replacement versus another procedure, on 6 outcomes [Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), walking, living situation (institutionalized or not), perceived health (excellent/good vs. fair/poor), rehospitalization, and mortality] at 3 post-discharge times (6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year). Mean age was 80, 80% were female, 96% White, 28% married, and 71% had a hip replacement. The treatment groups were similar at baseline (3 months before admission as reported at discharge) on ADLs, walking, living situation, and perceived health (all P > 0.24). After adjusting for demographics, clinical characteristics, fracture characteristics, and prior ADLs, walking ability, living situation, and perceived health, patients with a hip replacement did not do better at 6 weeks, 6 months, or 1 year post-discharge on any of the 6 outcome measures (all 18 P > 0.10). A global test of all 6 outcomes finds hip replacement patients doing less well at one year (P = 0.02). Despite the commonly held belief that hip replacement is a superior treatment for hip fracture, we found no suggestion of better outcomes for hip replacement on any of 6 key outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Variations in the Performance of Hip Fracture ProceduresMedical Care, 1997
- Hip FractureNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Perspective how many women have osteoporosis?Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1992
- The accuracy of Medicare's hospital claims data: progress has been made, but problems remain.American Journal of Public Health, 1992
- Displaced subcapital fractures of the femur: a prospective randomized comparison of internal fixation, hemiarthroplasty and total hip replacementInjury, 1989
- A clinical assessment of MedisGroupsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1988
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987
- Should We Abandon Primary Prosthetic Replacement for Fresh Displaced Fractures of the Neck of the Femur?Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ,1980
- Internal fixation versus primary prosthetic replacement in acute femoral neck fractures: A prospective, randomized clinical studyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1979
- “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinicianJournal of Psychiatric Research, 1975