Office hysteroscopic metroplasty: Three “diagnostic criteria” to differentiate between septate and bicornuate uteri
- 30 June 2007
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
- Vol. 14 (3), 324-328
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2006.11.010
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Office hysteroscopyObstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, 2004
- Reproductive outcome after hysteroscopic metroplasty in women with septate uterus and otherwise unexplained infertilityFertility and Sterility, 2004
- What does ‘diagnostic hysteroscopy’ mean today? The role of the new techniquesCurrent Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2003
- Hysteroscopy does not increase the risk of microscopic extrauterine spread in endometrial carcinomaInternational Journal of Gynecologic Cancer, 2003
- Endometrial Biopsies Using Small-Diameter Hysteroscopes and 5F Instruments: How Can We Obtain Enough Material for a Correct Histologic Diagnosis?The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, 2002
- Residual uterine septum of less than 1 cm after hysteroscopic metroplasty does not impair reproductive outcomeHuman Reproduction, 1996
- A vaginoscopic approach to hysteroscopyThe Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, 1995
- Argon laser versus microscissors for hysteroscopic incision of uterine septaAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1991
- Septate versus bicornuate uteri: errors in imaging diagnosis.Radiology, 1989
- Comparison Between Abdominal and Hysteroscopic MetroplastyObstetrics & Gynecology, 1986