The physician–patient relationship in treatment decision making at the end of life: A pilot study of cancer patients in a Southeast Asian society
- 18 July 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Palliative & Supportive Care
- Vol. 11 (1), 13-19
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1478951512000429
Abstract
Background: The traditional relationship between patient and physician in East Asian society has often been described as “paternalistic.” However, in an increasingly Westernized world, our knowledge of how patients perceive the role of the physician in their decision making regarding treatment is lacking. Objective: This article is part of a larger pilot study exploring the patient–physician dynamic on decision making among Southeast Asian palliative cancer patients. We explore: (1) influence of physicians, (2) the effect of symptom control and quality of life, and (3) dynamics and communication of physicians. Design: An interviewer-administered questionnaire was distributed, with 18 questions related to physician–patient interactions asked. Most questions followed a three point scale: “agree,” “neutral,” and “disagree,” and spontaneous answers beyond this framework were recorded. Setting/Participants: Thirty patients from the palliative care service were interviewed, including inpatients at Singapore General Hospital and those attending outpatient clinics at the National Cancer Centre. Results: Patients said that they themselves and their physicians were the main influences (80% each), over family members (48.3%). Some patients (26.7%) felt that symptoms were not well controlled, and 42.9% identified low mood or anxiety. Some patients (44.8%) felt that their condition had an effect on decision making. Most patients (89.3%) had a good relationship with the staff, with >80% being comfortable with discussions held. However, 20.7% of patients felt dissatisfied with the information provided, and 62.1% of patients wanted full disclosure of information. Significance of results: Patients appeared to place highest regard in both autonomy and physician input in making decisions, accompanied by an increased desire for more information. These reflect deviation away from traditional thinking of paternalistic doctoring in East Asia.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- End-of-Life Decision Making across CulturesThe Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2011
- Surrogate decision-maker for end-of-life care in terminally ill patients at Chiang Mai University Hospital, ThailandInternational Journal of Nursing Practice, 2009
- Medical decision making: paternalism versus patient-centered (autonomous) careCurrent Opinion in Critical Care, 2008
- Health Utilities Using the EQ-5D in Studies of CancerPharmacoEconomics, 2007
- Ethical Decision Making and Patient AutonomySocial psychiatry. Sozialpsychiatrie. Psychiatrie sociale, 2000
- Attitudes and beliefs of palliative care physicians regarding communication with terminally ill cancer patientsPalliative Medicine, 2000
- Patients' Preferences for Participation in Clinical Decision Making: A Review of Published SurveysBehavioral Medicine, 1998
- Chinese Confucian culture and the medical ethical tradition.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1995
- Information and Participation Preferences Among Cancer PatientsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1980