Fixing the Match
- 1 September 2013
- journal article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Vol. 132 (3), 711-719
- https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e31829ad2bb
Abstract
The authors studied residency applicant attitudes toward rank list creation, communication with programs, and the impact of these factors on their performance in the Match. An anonymous, 26-question, multiple-choice, online survey was distributed to the program coordinators of every Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited program participating in the National Resident Matching Program for whom e-mail addresses were available. The survey addressed five areas: (1) demographics and interview characteristics, (2) preinterview and interview factors, (3) postinterview contact, (4) importance of various factors in rank list creation, and (5) Match outcome. Survey responses were analyzed with Microsoft Excel. A total of 1179 responses were received. It was not possible to calculate a response rate, because the number of residents receiving the survey was not known. The majority of respondents (78 percent) reported postinterview contact with a program. A large portion of respondents (42 percent) considered such contact to be important in the creation of their rank lists. Half of all respondents admitted to exaggerating their interest in a program during or after an interview. The majority of respondents (87.5 percent) received no assistance in covering the costs of "second-look" visits to programs. Applicants may be modifying their rank lists in response to post-interview contact from programs; furthermore, they usually have no assistance in paying for the cost of second looks. To level the playing field for students and programs alike, the authors propose that the National Resident Matching Program modify residency interview rules to (1) disallow any postinterview contact between programs and students, and (2) disallow second looks.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Prevalence and Nature of Postinterview Communications Between Residency Programs and Applicants During the MatchAcademic Medicine, 2012
- A follow-up survey of the integrity of the dermatology National Resident Matching ProgramJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2012
- Fixing the “Match”: How to Play the GameJournal of Graduate Medical Education, 2012
- The integrity of the dermatology National Resident Matching Program: Results of a national studyJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2010
- Emergency Medicine Residency Applicant Perceptions of Unethical Recruiting Practices and Illegal Questioning in the MatchAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2009
- Financial and Educational Costs of the Residency Interview Process for Urology ApplicantsUrology, 2008
- Professionalism and the Match: A Pediatric Residency Program's Postinterview No-Call Policy and Its Impact on ApplicantsPediatrics, 2007
- General surgery program directors’ perceptions of the matchCurrent Surgery, 2000