Experimenting with reproducibility: a case study of robustness in bioinformatics
Open Access
- 28 June 2018
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in GigaScience
Abstract
Reproducibility has been shown to be limited in many scientific fields. This question is a fundamental tenet of scientific activity, but the related issues of reusability of scientific data are poorly documented. Here, we present a case study of our difficulties in reproducing a published bioinformatics method even though code and data were available. First, we tried to re-run the analysis with the code and data provided by the authors. Second, we reimplemented the whole method in a Python package to avoid dependency on a MATLAB license and ease the execution of the code on a high-performance computing cluster. Third, we assessed reusability of our reimplementation and the quality of our documentation, testing how easy it would be to start from our implementation to reproduce the results. In a second section, we propose solutions from this case study and other observations to improve reproducibility and research efficiency at the individual and collective levels. While finalizing our code, we created case-specific documentation and tutorials for the associated Python package StratiPy. Readers are invited to experiment with our reproducibility case study by generating the two confusion matrices (see more in section "Robustness: from MATLAB to Python, language and organization"). Here, we propose two options: a step-by-step process to follow in a Jupyter/IPython notebook or a Docker container ready to be built and run.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reproducibility of neuroimaging analyses across operating systemsFrontiers in Neuroscience, 2015
- An introduction to Docker for reproducible researchACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 2015
- Best Practices for Scientific ComputingPLoS Biology, 2014
- Does high public debt consistently stifle economic growth? A critique of Reinhart and RogoffCambridge Journal of Economics, 2013
- Ten Simple Rules for Reproducible Computational ResearchPLoS Computational Biology, 2013
- Network-based stratification of tumor mutationsNature Methods, 2013
- Next-generation sequencing data interpretation: enhancing reproducibility and accessibilityNature Reviews Genetics, 2012
- Reproducible Research in Computational ScienceScience, 2011
- Case studies in reproducibilityBriefings in Bioinformatics, 2011
- WaveLab and Reproducible ResearchPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,1995