The uniqueness of the human dentition as forensic evidence: a systematic review on the technological methodology
- 15 November 2014
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in International journal of legal medicine
- Vol. 129 (6), 1277-1283
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-1109-7
Abstract
The uniqueness of human dentition is routinely approached as identification evidence in forensic odontology. Specifically in bitemark and human identification cases, positive identifications are obtained under the hypothesis that two individuals do not have the same dental features. The present study compiles methodological information from articles on the uniqueness of human dentition to support investigations into the mentioned hypothesis. In April 2014, three electronic library databases (SciELO®, MEDLINE®/PubMed®, and LILACS®) were systematically searched. In parallel, reference lists of relevant studies were also screened. From the obtained articles (n = 1235), 13 full-text articles were considered eligible. They were examined according to the studied parameters: the sample size, the number of examined teeth, the registration technique for data collection, the methods for data analysis, and the study outcomes. Six combinations of studied data were detected: (1) dental shape, size, angulation, and position (n = 1); (2) dental shape, size, and angulation (n = 4); (3) dental shape and size (n = 5); (4) dental angulation and position (n = 2); (5) dental shape and angulation (n = 1); and (6) dental shape (n = 1). The sample size ranged between 10 and 1099 human dentitions. Ten articles examined the six anterior teeth, while three articles examined more teeth. Four articles exclusively addressed three-dimensional (3D) data registration, while six articles used two-dimensional (2D) imaging. In three articles, both imaging registrations were combined. Most articles (n = 9) explored the data using landmark placement. The other articles (n = 4) comprised digital comparison of superimposed dental contours. Although there were large methodological variations within the investigated articles, the uniqueness of human dentition remains unproved.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of systematic dental shape modification in bitemarksForensic Science International, 2013
- Patterns of Variation and Match Rates of the Anterior Biting Dentition: Characteristics of a Database of 3D‐Scanned DentitionsJournal of Forensic Sciences, 2013
- The examination and identification of bite marks in foods using 3D scanning and 3D comparison methodsInternational journal of legal medicine, 2011
- A Framework for Estimating Probability of a Match in Forensic Bite Mark Identification*,†Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2010
- Is current bite mark analysis a misnomer?Forensic Science International, 2010
- Similarity and match rates of the human dentition in three dimensions: relevance to bitemark analysisInternational journal of legal medicine, 2010
- Statistical Evidence for the Similarity of the Human DentitionJournal of Forensic Sciences, 2010
- The Uniqueness of the Human Anterior Dentition: A Geometric Morphometric AnalysisJournal of Forensic Sciences, 2007
- 3-D imaging and quantitative comparison of human dentitions and simulated bite marksInternational journal of legal medicine, 2006
- Quantitative forensic evaluation of bite marks with the aid of a shape analysis computer program: Part 1; The development of "SCIP" and the similarity index.1995