Evaluating inpatient mortality: a new electronic review process that gathers information from front-line providers
Open Access
- 20 October 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Quality & Safety
- Vol. 24 (1), 31-37
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003120
Abstract
Importance Accurately and routinely identifying factors contributing to inpatient mortality remains challenging. Objective To describe the development, implementation and performance of a new electronic mortality review method 1 year after implementation. Methods An analysis of data gathered from an electronic instrument that queries front-line providers on their opinions on quality and safety related issues, including potential preventability, immediately after a patient's death. Comparison was also made with chart reviews and administrative data. Results In the first 12 months, reviewers responded to 89% of reviews sent (2547 responses from 2869 requests), resulting in at least one review in 99% (1058/1068) of inpatient deaths. Clinicians provided suggestions for improvement in 7.7% (191/2491) of completed reviews, and reported that 4.8% (50/1052) of deaths may have been preventable. Quality and safety issues contributing to potentially preventable inpatient mortality included delays in obtaining or responding to tests (15/50, 30%), communication barriers (10/50, 20%) and healthcare associated infections (9/50, 18%). Independent, blinded chart review of a sample of clinician reviews detected potential preventability in 10% (2/20) of clinician reported cases as potentially preventable. Comparison with administrative data showed poor agreement on the identification of complications with neither source consistently identifying more complications. Conclusions Our early experience supports the feasibility and utility of an electronic tool to collect real-time clinical information related to inpatient deaths directly from front-line providers. Caregivers reported information that was complementary to data available from chart review and administrative sources in identifying potentially preventable deaths and informing quality improvement efforts.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Preventable mortality: does the perspective matter when determining preventability?Journal of Surgical Research, 2013
- Preventable deaths due to problems in care in English acute hospitals: a retrospective case record review studyBMJ Quality & Safety, 2012
- To what extent are adverse events found in patient records reported by patients and healthcare professionals via complaints, claims and incident reports?BMC Health Services Research, 2011
- Temporal Trends in Rates of Patient Harm Resulting from Medical CareThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Mortality and Readmission for Patients With Heart Failure Among U.S. News & World Report ’s Top Heart HospitalsCirculation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 2009
- Improving Patient Safety — Five Years after the IOM ReportThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Discussion of Medical Errors in Morbidity and Mortality ConferencesJAMA, 2003
- Case record review of adverse events: a new approachQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2003
- Estimating Hospital Deaths Due to Medical ErrorsJAMA, 2001
- INTER-RATER RELIABILITY OF PREVENTABLE DEATH JUDGMENTSThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 1992