The Use of a Personal Digital Assistant for Dietary Self-Monitoring Does Not Improve the Validity of Self-Reports of Energy Intake
- 31 August 2006
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of the American Dietetic Association
- Vol. 106 (8), 1256-1259
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2006.05.004
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Participation in a Behavioral Weight-Loss Program Worsens the Prevalence and Severity of Underreporting among Obese and Overweight WomenJournal of the American Dietetic Association, 2005
- The use of handheld computers in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 2002
- Impact of Interviewer's Body Mass Index on Underreporting Energy Intake in Overweight and Obese WomenObesity Research, 2002
- Biased Over- Or Under-Reporting is Characteristic of Individuals Whether Over Time or by Different Assessment MethodsJournal of the American Dietetic Association, 2001
- The sensitivity and specificity of the Goldberg cut-off for EI:BMR for identifying diet reports of poor validityEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2000
- Characteristics of the low-energy reporters in a longitudinal national dietary surveyBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1997
- Increasing prevalence of underreporting does not necessarily distort dietary surveysEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1997
- Dietary under-reporting: what people say about recording their food intakeEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1997
- Smoking and food intake in a field study: Continuous actometer/heart rate recording and pocket computer assisted dietary reports, subjective self-assessments, and mental performanceDrug Development Research, 1994
- What are people really eating? The relation between energy intake derived from estimated diet records and intake determined to maintain body weightThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1991