The Effect of Managed Care on ICU Length of Stay
- 2 October 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 276 (13), 1075-1082
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1996.03540130073033
Abstract
Objective. —To determine whether insurance status (managed care vs traditional commercial and Medicare) influences resource consumption (as measured by length of stay [LOS]) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Design. —Retrospective analysis of the 1992 Massachusetts state hospital discharge database, using prospectively developed and validated risk-stratification models. Setting. —All nonfederal hospitals in Massachusetts. Subjects. —Of all adult hospitalizations where an ICU stay was incurred (n=104270), we selected those covered by 1 of 4 payer groups (n=88 050): (1) commercial fee-for-service (patients aged R2=0.84 andR2L[likelihood ratio statistic]=0.92 for the development set, andR2=0.83 andR2L=0.89 for the validation set). Significant covariables affecting LOS included age, severity of principal illness, comorbidity, reason for admission, and discharge status (P<.001 for each). Among the cohort younger than 65 years (n=27 805), although unadjusted mean ICU LOS was shorter (2.9 vs 3.43 days;P<.05) for those covered by managed care organizations, payer status had no independent effect on ICU LOS (P=.48). Among those older than 65 years, there was neither a difference in unadjusted ICU LOS (3.94 vs 3.88 days;P≥.05) nor an independent effect of payer on ICU LOS (P=.35). Unadjusted mortality was lower among managed care patients (3.9% vs 5.1% in patients aged < 65 years [P<.05] and 8.7% vs 12.1% in patients aged ≥65 years [P<.05]). Age, severity of principal diagnosis, comorbidity, and reason for admission significantly influenced mortality (P<.001). After controlling for these factors with the mortality model (R2L=0.92 and 0.89, C statistic [12df]=8.45 and 17.58, andP=.75 and.13 [where a largePreflects good agreement] for the development and validation sets, respectively), payer continued to have a small but significant effect on mortality (odds ratios ranging from 1.67 at 0.1% probability of death to 1.11 at 30% probability of death). Managed care penetration among the commercially insured varied across hospitals (n=82) from 0% to 68%. There was no correlation between managed care penetration and either ICU LOS (R2=0.04;P=.09) or mortality (R2=0.0;P=.88). Conclusions. —Though patients covered under managed care consume fewer ICU resources, this appears to be primarily attributable to a difference in patientrelated factors. Thus, as managed care case mix changes in the future to include sicker and older patients, the initial advantages of reduced resource consumption may diminish.This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Surgical Research in a Capitated SystemArchives of Surgery, 1995
- Managed care plan performance since 1980. A literature analysisJAMA, 1994
- Contribution of a Measure of Disease Complexity (COMPLEX) to Prediction of Outcome and Charges Among Hospitalized PatientsMayo Clinic Proceedings, 1992
- Resource utilization among intensive care patients. Managed care vs traditional insuranceArchives of Internal Medicine, 1992
- Effect of a gatekeeper plan on health services use and charges: a randomized trial.American Journal of Public Health, 1989
- Economics of Prolonged Mechanical VentilationAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease, 1989
- Alternative approaches to receiver operating characteristic analyses.Radiology, 1988
- Inpatient Length of Stay in Twin Cities Health PlansMedical Care, 1986
- Staging of disease. A case-mix measurementJAMA, 1984
- The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Radiology, 1982