Improving peer review: who's responsible?
- 18 March 2004
- Vol. 328 (7441), 657-658
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7441.657
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trialBMJ, 2004
- Continuing Medical Education and the Physician as a LearnerJAMA, 2002
- Measuring the Quality of Editorial Peer ReviewJAMA, 2002
- Masking, Blinding, and Peer Review: The Blind Leading the BlindedAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1998
- No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice.1995
- Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategiesJAMA, 1995
- What Is a Curriculum?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1992