Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update)
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 26 October 2016
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Implementation Science
- Vol. 11 (1), 1-12
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0510-7
Abstract
There is a significant potential for e-health to deliver cost-effective, quality health care, and spending on e-health systems by governments and healthcare systems is increasing worldwide. However, there remains a tension between the use of e-health in this way and implementation. Furthermore, the large body of reviews in the e-health implementation field, often based on one particular technology, setting or health condition make it difficult to access a comprehensive and comprehensible summary of available evidence to help plan and undertake implementation. This review provides an update and re-analysis of a systematic review of the e-health implementation literature culminating in a set of accessible and usable recommendations for anyone involved or interested in the implementation of e-health. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and The Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between 2009 and 2014. Studies were included if they were systematic reviews of the implementation of e-health. Data from included studies were synthesised using the principles of meta-ethnography, and categorisation of the data was informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Forty-four reviews mainly from North America and Europe were included. A range of e-health technologies including electronic medical records and clinical decision support systems were represented. Healthcare settings included primary care, secondary care and home care. Factors important for implementation were identified at the levels of the following: the individual e-health technology, the outer setting, the inner setting and the individual health professionals as well as the process of implementation. This systematic review of reviews provides a synthesis of the literature that both acknowledges the multi-level complexity of e-health implementation and provides an accessible and useful guide for those planning implementation. New interpretations of a large amount of data across e-health systems and healthcare settings have been generated and synthesised into a set of useable recommendations for practice. This review provides a further empirical test of the CFIR and identifies areas where additional research is necessary. PROSPERO, CRD42015017661Keywords
Funding Information
- Programme Grants for Applied Research (RP-PG-0609-10135)
This publication has 61 references indexed in Scilit:
- Qualitative synthesis and systematic review in health professions educationMedical Education, 2013
- Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2012
- The effect of electronic medical record-based clinical decision support on HIV care in resource-constrained settings: A systematic reviewInternational Journal of Medical Informatics, 2012
- Impact of electronic medical record on physician practice in office settings: a systematic reviewBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2012
- Personal health records: a scoping reviewJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2011
- Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventionsBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2011
- Assessing the impact of user-centered research on a clinical trial eHealth tool via counterbalanced research designJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2011
- A knowledge-based taxonomy of critical factors for adopting electronic health record systems by physicians: a systematic literature reviewBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2010
- Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventionsBMC Health Services Research, 2010